Computer Systems Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      95. Is there a clear Computer Systems Engineering case definition?

      <--- Score

      96. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      97. When are meeting minutes sent out? Who is on the distribution list?

      <--- Score

      98. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      99. Are all requirements met?

      <--- Score

      100. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      101. Has a Computer Systems Engineering requirement not been met?

      <--- Score

      102. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?

      <--- Score

      103. Are accountability and ownership for Computer Systems Engineering clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      104. Do you have organizational privacy requirements?

      <--- Score

      105. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      106. How do you think the partners involved in Computer Systems Engineering would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      107. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      108. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      109. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      110. What are the record-keeping requirements of Computer Systems Engineering activities?

      <--- Score

      111. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      112. What is the scope of the Computer Systems Engineering work?

      <--- Score

      113. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      114. How does the Computer Systems Engineering manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      115. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      116. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      117. Will team members regularly document their Computer Systems Engineering work?

      <--- Score

      118. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      119. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      120. Do you have a Computer Systems Engineering success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      121. Is Computer Systems Engineering currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      122. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      123. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Computer Systems Engineering brings?

      <--- Score

      124. When is/was the Computer Systems Engineering start date?

      <--- Score

      125. Is there a Computer Systems Engineering management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      126. What are (control) requirements for Computer Systems Engineering Information?

      <--- Score

      127. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      128. What would be the goal or target for a Computer Systems Engineering’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      129. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      130. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      131. How do you manage changes in Computer Systems Engineering requirements?

      <--- Score

      132. How can the value of Computer Systems Engineering be defined?

      <--- Score

      133. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      134. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      135. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Computer Systems Engineering goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?

      <--- Score

      136. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      137. СКАЧАТЬ