Financial Health Management A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Financial Health Management A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 6

СКАЧАТЬ

      <--- Score

      11. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      12. How does the Financial Health Management manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      13. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      14. How and when will the baselines be defined?

      <--- Score

      15. What are the tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      16. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      17. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      18. Are the Financial Health Management requirements complete?

      <--- Score

      19. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Financial Health Management work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      20. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      21. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      22. How are consistent Financial Health Management definitions important?

      <--- Score

      23. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Financial Health Management? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      25. What are the Financial Health Management tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      26. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      27. Who is gathering Financial Health Management information?

      <--- Score

      28. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      29. What is the scope of Financial Health Management?

      <--- Score

      30. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      31. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      32. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Financial Health Management leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      33. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      34. What is the scope?

      <--- Score

      35. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      36. Is there a critical path to deliver Financial Health Management results?

      <--- Score

      37. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      38. What intelligence can you gather?

      <--- Score

      39. Are task requirements clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      40. What Financial Health Management services do you require?

      <--- Score

      41. How do you manage unclear Financial Health Management requirements?

      <--- Score

      42. What is the scope of the Financial Health Management work?

      <--- Score

      43. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      44. What sources do you use to gather information for a Financial Health Management study?

      <--- Score

      45. The political context: who holds power?

      <--- Score

      46. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      47. What would be the goal or target for a Financial Health Management’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      48. What are the record-keeping requirements of Financial Health Management activities?

      <--- Score

      49. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      50. How would you define Financial Health Management leadership?

      <--- Score

      51. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      52. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?

      <--- Score

      53. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      54. Has/have the СКАЧАТЬ