Claves del derecho de redes empresariales. AAVV

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ

      DAS, T. K., & TENG, B.-S. 2000. Instabilities of Strategic Alliances: An Internal Tensions Perspective. Organization Science, 11(1): 77-101.

      DYER, J. H., & SINGH, H. 1998. The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660-679.

      EBERS, M., & OERLEMANS, L. 2013. The Variety of Governance Structures Beyond Market and Hierarchy. Journal of Management, published online ahead of print on October 21, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0149206313506938

      EDWARDS, C. D. 1955. Conglomerate Bigness as a Source of Power. In G. J. Stiglitz (Ed.), Business Concentration and Price Policy Report: 331-359. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

      GIMENO, J. 2004. Competition within and between networks: the contingent effect of competitive embeddedness on alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6): 820-842.

      GOMES-CASSERES, B. 1994. Group Versus Group: How Alliance Networks Compete. Harvard Business Review, 72(4): 62-74.

      GOMES-CASSERES, B. 1996. The Alliance Revolution: The New Shape of Business Rivalry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

      GOMES-CASSERES, B. 2003.Competitive Advantage in Alliance Constellations. Strategic Organization, 1(3): 327-335.

      GNYAWALI, D. R., & MADHAVAN, R. 2001. Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 431-445.

      KALE, P., DYER, J. H., & Singh, H. 2002.Alliance Capability, Stock Market response, and Long-Term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function. Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 747-767.

      KLAAS-WISSING, T., & ALBERS, S. 2010.Cooperative versus Corporate Governance of LTL Networks. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 13(6): 493-506.

      KLEYMANN, B. 2005. The dynamics of multilateral allying: a process perspective on airline alliances. Journal of Air Transport Management, 11(3): 135-147.

      KOKA, B. R., & PRESCOTT, J. E. 2008.Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6): 639-661.

      LAZZARINI, S. G. 2007. The impact of membership in competing alliance constellations: Evidence on the operational performance of global airlines. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4): 345-367.

      LI, J., & NETESSINE, S. 2011. Partnering with Competitors - An Empirical Analysis of Airline Alliances and Multimarket Competition. INSEAD Working Paper 2011/114/ TOM/ACGRE (URL: www.isead.edu/facultyresearch/research/doc.cfm?did =48747)

      LUO, Y. 2007. A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2): 129-144.

      MÖLLERING, G. 2010. Kartelle, Konsortien, Kooperationen und die Entstehung neuer Märkte. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (zfbf), 62(7): 770-796.

      NOHRIA, N., & GARCÍA-PONT, C. 1991.Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1): 105-124.

      PARK, S. H., & UNGSON, G. R. 2001.Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure. Organization Science, 12(1): 37-53.

      PEARSON, S. 2013. Latam picks Oneworld over Star Alliance. FT.com. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4a768b4e-874a-11e2-bde6-00144feabdc0.html: Accessed 7.05.2013.

      PORTER, M. E. 2008. The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1): 78-93.

      POWELL, T. C. 2001. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9): 875-888.

      REUER, J. J., ZOLLO, M., & SINGH, H. 2002. Post-Formation Dynamics in Strategic Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2): 135-151.

      SAMPSON, R. C. 2004. The Cost of Misaligned Governance in R&D Alliances. Journal of Law Economics & Organization, 20(2): 484-526.

      SILVERMAN, B. S., & BAUM, J. A. C. 2002. Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4): 791-806.

      SUAREZ, F. F., & LANZOLLA, G. 2007. The Role of Environmental Dynamics in Building a First Mover Advantage Theory. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 377-392.

      TEECE, D. J., PISANO, G., & SHUEN, A. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.

      UZZI, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35-67.

      VANHAVERBEKE, W., & NOORDERHAVEN, N. G. 2001.Competition between Alliance Blocks: The Case of the RISC Microprocessor Technology. Organization Studies, 22(1): 1-30.

      WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York, London: Free Press.

      WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1991. Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2): 269-296.

      YU, T., & CANNELLA, A. A. 2013.A Comprehensive Review of Multimarket Competition Research. Journal of Management, 39(1): 76-109.

      YU, T., SUBRAMANIAM, M., & CANNELLA JR, A. A. 2009. Rivalry Deterrence in International Markets: Contingencies Governing the Mutual Forbearance Hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1): 127-147.

      CAPÍTULO 6

      Estructuras de gobernanza en redes empresariales

      PETER KREBS Y STEFANIE JUNG

      1. INTRODUCCIÓN

      Las redes empresariales son una forma difundida de cooperación en Europa, no solo para las pequeñas y medianas empresas (PYMEs)²⁵², sino también para él a veces descuidado grupo de las empresas de rango medio.²⁵³ Por el contrario, las grandes empresas a menudo no ven la necesidad de cooperar con socios en el marco de una red empresarial. Incluso si están dispuestas a unirse a una red empresarial, la legislación antimonopolio europea y nacional (Cf. art. 101 TFUE y § 1 ley antimonopolio alemana) prohíbe la mayoría de las formas de participación que son interesantes para las grandes empresas desde el punto de vista económico.²⁵⁴ Una de las pocas oportunidades interesantes para las grandes empresas es la investigación conjunta en base a cooperaciones, ya que la ley de defensa de la competencia es menos estricta con respecto a este aspecto.

      A pesar de ser un instrumento ampliamente utilizado, las redes empresariales hasta el momento no han sido totalmente comprendidas desde una perspectiva jurídica. En un reciente estudio sobre las redes empresariales el 54,3% de las empresas encuestadas declaró que se encuentran con problemas legales significativos cuando se busca establecer u operar una red empresarial.²⁵⁵ De este modo, las redes empresariales constituyen un campo de investigación relevante económica СКАЧАТЬ