Vibroacoustic Simulation. Alexander Peiffer
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Vibroacoustic Simulation - Alexander Peiffer страница 26

Название: Vibroacoustic Simulation

Автор: Alexander Peiffer

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Отраслевые издания

Серия:

isbn: 9781119849865

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ alt="upper R Subscript f g Baseline left-parenthesis tau right-parenthesis equals upper E left-bracket f left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis g left-parenthesis t plus tau right-parenthesis right-bracket equals upper E left-bracket f left-parenthesis t prime minus tau right-parenthesis g left-parenthesis t Superscript prime Baseline right-parenthesis right-bracket equals upper R Subscript g f Baseline left-parenthesis negative tau right-parenthesis period"/> (1.155)

      So we get finally

      For the stationary ergodic process we can replace the ensemble averaging by the average over time

      1.5.4 Fourier Analysis of Random Signals

      The Fourier transform of a random signal would lead to infinite results because it is not approaching zero. Fourier series cannot be applied too, because there is no periodicity in the signal. A smart solution is to use the correlation function for the Fourier transform and not the random signal itself. The correlation is a decaying function that is suitable for infinite integration due to the 1/T factor in (1.157). We start with the pair of Fourier transforms of the autocorrelation:

       StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column upper S Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals integral Subscript negative normal infinity Superscript normal infinity Baseline upper R Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis tau right-parenthesis e Superscript minus j omega tau Baseline d tau EndLayout (1.158a)

       StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column upper R Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis tau right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals StartFraction 1 Over 2 pi EndFraction integral Subscript negative normal infinity Superscript normal infinity Baseline upper S Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis e Superscript j omega tau Baseline d omega EndLayout (1.158b)

      Sff(ω) is called the auto spectral density auto spectral density of the signal f(t). It is a measure of how the signal energy is distributed over the frequency range. This becomes quite obvious if we look at τ = 0 and use (1.153):

       upper R Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis 0 right-parenthesis equals StartFraction 1 Over 2 pi EndFraction integral Subscript negative normal infinity Superscript normal infinity Baseline upper S Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis d omega equals upper E left-bracket f squared left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis right-bracket (1.159)

      The autocorrelation is a real symmetric function, thus the auto spectrum as Fourier transform of this is a symmetric real valued function in frequency.

       StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column bold-italic upper S Subscript f g Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals integral Subscript negative normal infinity Superscript normal infinity Baseline upper R Subscript f g Baseline e Superscript minus j omega tau Baseline d tau EndLayout (1.160)

       StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column upper R Subscript f g Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals StartFraction 1 Over 2 pi EndFraction integral Subscript negative normal infinity Superscript normal infinity Baseline bold-italic upper S Subscript f g Baseline e Superscript j omega tau Baseline d tau period EndLayout (1.161)

      Changing the integration constant τ=−τ′ and using symmetry (1.156) reveals

       bold-italic upper S Subscript f g Baseline equals bold-italic upper S Subscript g f (1.162)

      Mathematically, the expected value of an ergodic processes is derived by the investigation of infinite time periods. However, this can neither be realized in tests nor numerical simulations. We are restricted to specific time slots, so let us assume the Fourier transform of two random signals f(t) and g(t).

       StartLayout 1st Row 1st Column bold-italic upper F Subscript k Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis 2nd Column equals integral Subscript 0 Superscript upper T Baseline f Subscript k Baseline left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis e Superscript minus j omega t Baseline d t 3rd Column bold-italic upper G Subscript k Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis 4th Column equals integral Subscript 0 Superscript upper T Baseline g Subscript k Baseline left-parenthesis t right-parenthesis e Superscript minus j omega t Baseline d t EndLayout (1.163)

      It can be shown by a straightforward but lengthy proof by Bendat and Piersol (1980) that the cross spectral density is a complex function given by

      Here, we take the signals of infinite duration from an ensemble of recordings. The same can be shown for the autospectrum.

       upper S Subscript f f Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis equals limit Underscript upper T right-arrow normal infinity Endscripts upper E left-bracket StartFraction 1 Over upper T EndFraction bold-italic upper F Subscript k Superscript asterisk Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis bold-italic upper F Subscript k Baseline left-parenthesis omega right-parenthesis right-bracket (1.165)

      So these important relationships show, that if we have an infinite time period T and we average over a whole ensemble of such records we can determine the auto and cross spectra from this. In practical test and simulation situations we will see that for a given number of time signals of finite time T we can estimate the power- and cross spectral density. For convenience we abbreviate Equation (1.164)

       СКАЧАТЬ