Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage - Группа авторов страница 42

Название: Geophysical Monitoring for Geologic Carbon Storage

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: География

Серия:

isbn: 9781119156840

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ gas up to ~35 MPa, and introduce and extract fluids into and from the sample through ports attached to the metal rods. The temperature of the system is controlled using both a fluid‐circulating heating/cooling jacket attached to the exterior wall of the pressure vessel (Temco/Corelab, X‐ray transparent, carbon‐fiber‐wrapped, tubular aluminum cell) and film heaters lining the interior wall of the aluminum suspension cage. (Our past experiments have been conducted at temperatures ranging from −15°C up to 65°C.) During the experiments, changes in the distribution of different fluid phases within the sample can be examined using X‐ray CT (Nakagawa et al., 2013), similar to the experiment previously conducted by Cadoret et al. (1995) during conventional resonant bar tests.

Schematic illustration of split-Hopkinson Resonant Bar.

      5.2.2. Experimental Procedures

      After the dry measurements, the sample was evacuated and injected with low‐pressure CO2 gas for several cycles to purge the air in the pore space. After the final evacuation step, de‐aired water was slowly injected from one end of the sample. (Note that excessive clay swelling by low‐salinity water can result in disintegration of the rock and loss of permeability. In this experiment, tap water was used after confirming that it caused no significant swelling of clays in the sample.) Once the sample was water saturated, the confining stress and pore pressure were increased to 10.4 MPa and 3.5 MPa, respectively, to ensure dissolution of the remaining CO2 gas into the pore fluid over ~12 hours. During this period, the temperature of the sample and the pressure cell was also increased up to 60.5°C.

      Prior to the subsequent scCO2 injection experiment, the confining stress and the pore pressure were increased again, up to 22.1 MPa and 13.6 MPa (8.5 MPa differential stress), while maintaining the sample temperature at 60.5°C. Under these conditions, CO2 is supercritical, with viscosity 0.040 cP, bulk modulus 0.040 GPa, and density 535 kg/m3 (NIST Webbook, http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/). In comparison, the water has viscosity 0.47 cP, bulk modulus 2.46 GPa, and density 989 kg/m3. The scCO2 was injected into the core sample at a constant rate, and the pore pressure was controlled using a back‐pressure regulator at the outlet. The injection rate varied from 0.017 to 0.043 mL/min for various test cases, and the sample cross section of 11.4 cm2 (slightly larger for a fractured sample). The pore volume replaced by the injected scCO2 was determined from the weight of the displaced water. The injection was continued until scCO2 broke through the core and no more water was produced from the system. The long‐term drying effect of the scCO2 was not examined in this experiment.

Photo depicts an on-going scCO2 injection experiment.

      Saturation of the pore space by scCO2 in the samples can be determined from CT images by comparing the CT values (X‐ray absorption values) of water‐saturated and scCO2‐injected samples. The image resolution (the voxel size) is not sufficient for exactly resolving the pore space geometry. However, from the CT values of 100% water or scCO2‐saturated samples and a sample saturated by both water and scCO2 (upper C upper T Subscript normal upper H 2 normal upper O , upper C upper T Subscript s c upper C upper O 2 , and CT Mix, respectively), the average scCO2 saturation value for each voxel is computed by (e.g., Seol & Kneafsey, 2011)

      (5.1)upper S Subscript s c upper C upper O 2 Baseline equals StartFraction upper C upper T Subscript normal upper H 2 normal upper O Baseline minus upper C upper T Subscript upper M i x Baseline Over upper C upper T Subscript normal upper H 2 normal upper O Baseline minus upper C upper T Subscript s c upper C upper O 2 Baseline EndFraction period

      Similarly, fracture apertures can be determined from CT values of intact and fractured samples at the fracture location and of the fluid within the fracture (CT Intact, CT Fractured, and CT Pore fluid, respectively) (Ketcham et al., 2010). Note that the intact sample measurement can be substituted by the CT values of the rock matrix near the fracture, if the sample is reasonably homogeneous. For this case, the fracture aperture is computed by

      (5.2)h equals StartFraction upper C upper T Subscript upper I n t a c t Baseline minus upper C upper T Subscript upper F r a c t u r e d Baseline Over upper C upper T Subscript upper I n t a c t Baseline minus upper C upper T Subscript upper P o r e f l u i d Baseline EndFraction upper L Subscript upper V o x e l Baseline comma

      where L Voxel is the dimension of the voxel in the image.

      Ideally, the CT‐indicated density of the scCO2‐saturated case would also be used for saturation СКАЧАТЬ