Sustainable Agriculture Systems and Technologies. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Sustainable Agriculture Systems and Technologies - Группа авторов страница 29

Название: Sustainable Agriculture Systems and Technologies

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Биология

Серия:

isbn: 9781119808558

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_49f55ddb-5474-5ff0-ad2f-ab2db5cb099b">Table 3.4 Performance of crossbred lactating cows fed on homemade balanced concentrates mixtures.

Ingredients Concentrate mixtures
CM‐I CM‐II CM‐III CM‐IV
Initial body weight (kg) 362.1 ± 4.08 367.4 ± 4.06 364.6 ± 3.11 366.7 ± 2.68
Final body weight (kg) 363.3 ± 4.17 368.1 ± 3.96 365.7 ± 3.33 368.6 ± 3.75
Initial milk yield (kg/d/cow) 7.24 ± 0.12 7.22 ± 0.11 7.30 ± 0.15 7.10 ± 0.09
Final milk yield (kg/d/cow) 7.42 ± 0.18 7.56 ± 0.10 7.76 ± 0.18 7.94 ± 0.14
Fat content of milk (%) 3.41 ± 0.02 3.46 ± 0.02 3.21 ± 0.06 3.44 ± 0.01
Green fodder intake (kg/d/cow) 3.93 ± 0.26 4.05 ± 0.99 3.96 ± 1.01 4.14 ± 0.92
Dry fodder intake (kg/d/cow) 3.54 ± 0.88 3.53 ± 0.90 3.98 ± 0.97 3.76 ± 0.99
Concentrate intake (kg/d/cow) 5.13 ± 0.11 4.60 ± 0.21 5.62 ± 0.45 6.67 ± 0.76
Total DM intake (kg/d) 12.60 ± 0.23 12.18 ± 0.47 13.56 ± 0.65 14.57 ± 0.81
DMI (kg/100 kg body weight) 3.46 ± 0.12 3.31 ± 0.09 3.71 ± 0.16 3.95 ± 0.21
DCP intake (kg/100 kg body weight) 0.272 ± 0.06 0.250 ± 0.05 0.297 ± 0.0.9 0.341 ± 0.11
TDN intake (kg/100 kg body weight) 2.002 ± 0.18 1.882 ± 0.11 2.143 ± 0.09 2.373 ± 0.14
Cost of concentrate feed (Rs./t) 6910 6930 6940 7280
Cost of total feed (Rs./d) 62.47 ± 0.62 65.11 ± 0.84 74.52 ± 0.58 82.36 ± 0.39
Feed cost for milk production (Rs./kg of milk) 9.15 ± 0.08 8.61 ± 0.12 9.60 ± 0.18 10.37 ± 0.11

      Garg et al. (2009) reported that ration balancing improved milk production by 0.58 kg/animal/day with increment of 0.5% milk fat. After ration balancing, the improvement in milk production efficiency resulted in more milk from the same amount of feed. Milk production efficiency (kg fat corrected milk yield/kg DMI) of cows was 0.58 and 0.78 kg/kg, respectively for cows, before and after ration balancing. For buffaloes these values were 0.53 and 0.66 kg/kg. Balanced feeding can reduce the methane emissions from livestock farming, which is utilized for production purposes rather than maintenance, also known as the maintenance dilution effect (Garg et al. 2013). Vagamashi et al. (2016) observed improvement of daily milk yield by 0.95 l/day/animal and milk fat by 0.24% (3.98–4.22%) on feeding a balanced ration. This may be attributed to more efficient utilization of dietary energy and protein in lactating cow as reported by Garg and Bhanderi (2011). Findings are also similar to that of Haldar and Rai (2003), Bhanderi et al. (2016), and Mahanta (2017).

      TMR and homemade balanced feed are two important technologies for dairy sector in reducing the production cost as well as maintaining good health of animals. In most parts of the eastern region, undernutrition is a major constraint in animal production due to high cost of concentrate, lack of green fodder and quality dry fodder. Therefore, major share of ration is constituted by only crop residues and by‐products. As a result, full potential of production and reproduction of dairy animals is not exploited. Moreover, high cost of concentrate feed results in increase in input cost and thereby, nonprofitability of dairy farming. Feeding of homemade balanced concentrate together with TMR can solve the problem, particularly in smallholder milk production system. In recent years mobile‐based ration balancing programme is being implemented in many parts of India by NDDB. However, still it is not gaining up to the mark, particularly among resource poor farmers. Readymade availability of different types of homemade concentrate feed formulas may be acceptable СКАЧАТЬ