Congo Basin Hydrology, Climate, and Biogeochemistry. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Congo Basin Hydrology, Climate, and Biogeochemistry - Группа авторов страница 33

Название: Congo Basin Hydrology, Climate, and Biogeochemistry

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: География

Серия:

isbn: 9781119656999

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="#ulink_0c452155-f875-5142-9f4d-71052b99b9b1">Figure 3.7 Maps of rainfall (mm/mo) for March, based on nine satellite products and three gauge products (GPCC, individual stations, NIC131‐gridded) (from Nicholson et al., 2019; © American Meteorological Society. Used with permission).

Schematic illustration of interannual variability of rainfall (mm/yr) over the central Congo Basin and over a large portion of the Central African Republic.

      Source: Jackson et al., 2009. © American Meteorological Society. Used with permission.

      Figure 3.8 shows the interannual variability of March/April and October/November rainfall over the Congo Basin and over the Central African Republic (CAR) to the north. The gauge network is dense over CAR and the satellite products are in good agreement with each other and with the NIC131‐gridded data set. For the Congo Basin, a fair amount of gauge data was available until the mid‐1990s, after which time there is wide disparity among the estimates and little agreement with the NIC131‐gridded data set. These results suggest that the reason for the poor performance of satellite products in this region is the paucity of gauge data.

      When the products shown above were validated against gauge data (Camberlin et al., 2019; Nicholson et al., 2019), the best performing products appeared to be CHIRPS for mean rainfall, TRMM for daily rainfall, and CHIRPS2 and TRMM for interannual variability. Both products show generally good agreement with gauge data over the Congo on monthly time scales and thus are selected for use in this study.

      Most rainfall analyses in this chapter are based on the CHIRPS2 satellite product (Funk et al., 2015). It has a spatial resolution of 0.05° × 0.05° and a daily temporal resolution. CHIRPS2 begins in 1981 and extends through 2019. However, TRMM 3B43 Version 7 is used to evaluate rainfall over the Amazon. It runs from 1998 to 2014 and has a spatial resolution of 0.25 degrees of latitude/longitude. Its temporal resolution is monthly. Both CHIRPS2 and TRMM 3B43 Version 7 have been extensively validated over equatorial Africa and show a close relationship to gauge rainfall (e.g., Camberlin et al., 2019; Nicholson et al., 2019). TRMM 3B42 V7 is used here to ascertain the diurnal cycle of rainfall. Its successor from the global precipitation measurement mission (GPM), IMERG, has much higher temporal and spatial resolution and is available since 2014. However, it has not been validated over the Congo Basin and for that reason TRMM is used instead.

      3.4.1. Annual Rainfall

Schematic illustration of (a) Mean annual rainfall (mm) based on gauge data for the period 1945 to 1984 and CHIRPS2 data for the period 1981 to 2019. (b) Mean rainfall for four individual months from CHIRPS2 for the period 1981 to 2019.

      Throughout the basin mean annual rainfall exceeds 1250 mm, but it exceeds 1500 mm over most of the region. In the core of the basin, annual rainfall exceeds 1750 mm. Within that area are three maxima, located at roughly the equator and 20°E, 2°S, and 28°E, and 3°N and 28°E. CHIRPS2 shows the maximum at 2°S and 28°E to be the strongest. Mean annual rainfall exceeds 2000 mm in at least some areas. Rainfall maxima are also evident along the Atlantic coast between roughly the equator and 7°N, over the Ethiopian highlands, over the western portion of Lake Victoria, and in a small sector of western Kenya (northeast of Lake Victoria). The aridity of eastern Africa contrasts sharply with the high rainfall over the Congo Basin.

      3.4.2. Monthly Rainfall

      Figure 3.9 also shows mean rainfall during four individual months based on CHIRPS2: January, April, July, and October. The gauge analysis indicates similar results and hence is not shown. The seasonal shift in the tropical rainbelt over the region is clearly evident. In January peak rainfall is south of the equator, with monthly rainfall on the order of 100 to 200 mm. It exceeds 150 mm over most of that area. North of the equator monthly rainfall progressively decreases from 100 mm near the equator to less than 10 mm at around 6°N. In April the rainbelt is displaced northward. Mean rainfall is on the order of 100 to 200 mm throughout the latitude span of 10°S to 7°N, with rainfall decreasing rapidly further north. Further displacement is evident in July, with high rainfall north of the equator and a rapid decrease southward from the equator. July rainfall decreases from roughly 50 mm near the equator to less than 10 mm in the southernmost regions. In October the rain belt retreats southward and high rainfall extends throughout the basin. The rainbelt is most extensive and strongest during this month. Vast areas receive 200 to 300 mm of rainfall.

      3.4.3. The Seasonal Cycle