Communicating in Risk, Crisis, and High Stress Situations: Evidence-Based Strategies and Practice. Vincent T. Covello
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Communicating in Risk, Crisis, and High Stress Situations: Evidence-Based Strategies and Practice - Vincent T. Covello страница 35

СКАЧАТЬ parties and stakeholders.

      4 Acknowledge the legitimacy of people’s emotional response to risks issues.

      5 Provide feedback to people on what you heard and ask for confirmation.

      6 Recognize the “hidden agendas,” symbolic meanings, and broader cultural, economic, or political considerations that often underlie and complicate risk and crisis communication.

      3.5.4 Principle 4. Be Honest, Frank, and Open

      Honesty and transparency play a large role in trust determination. Trust is your most precious asset when communicating information about risks or threats. Trust is difficult to earn, and once lost, difficult to regain.

      Guidelines:

      1 State your credentials but do not ask or expect to be trusted.

      2 Disclose risk and crisis information as soon as possible, emphasizing appropriate reservations about reliability.

      3 Do not minimize or exaggerate the level of risk.

      4 Speculate only with great caution.

      5 If in doubt, lean toward sharing more information, not less.

      6 Discuss data uncertainties, strengths, and weaknesses, including those identified by credible sources.

      7 Identify worst‐case estimates, citing ranges of risk estimates when appropriate.

      3.5.5 Principle 5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sources

      Allies and partners can be critically effective in helping you communicate risk information in crisis and noncrisis situations. Few things make risk and crisis communication more difficult than conflicts or public disagreements with other credible sources.

      Guidelines:

      1 Coordinate all interorganizational and intraorganizational risk and crisis communications efforts.

      2 Devote effort and resources to the slow, hard work of building bridges, and relationships with important allies and partners.

      3 Use credible and authoritative intermediaries to communicate risk and crisis information.

      4 Consult with allies and partners about who is best able to answer questions.

      5 Try to issue joint communications with trustworthy sources.

      3.5.6 Principle 6. Meet the Needs of Traditional and Social Media

      Traditional media outlets – such as radio, television, newspapers, and magazines – and social media outlets are prime sources of risk information. They play a critical role in setting agendas and in determining outcomes.

      Guidelines:

      1 Be accessible.

      2 Respect deadlines.

      3 Provide information tailored to the needs of each type of media.

      4 Prepare in advance and provide background material on complex issues.

      5 Follow up media stories with praise or criticism, or respectful corrections, as warranted.

      6 Try to establish relationships of trust with specific editors, reporters, writers, commentators, and bloggers.

      7 Be proactive, first, accurate, and credible.

      3.5.7 Principle 7. Speak Clearly and with Compassion

      Technical language and jargon are useful as professional shorthand, but they are barriers to the successful risk and crisis communication.

      Guidelines:

      1 Use language appropriate to the target audience.

      2 Use vivid, concrete images that communicate information about risks on a personal level.

      3 Use stories, examples, and anecdotes that make technical risk‐related data and information come alive.

      4 Avoid distant, abstract, unfeeling language about deaths, injuries, illnesses, or harm; acknowledge – and say – that any illness, injury, or death is a tragedy.

      5 Acknowledge, and respond to, both in words and with actions, the emotions people are feeling and expressing, including anxiety, fear, anger, and outrage.

      6 Acknowledge and respond to the factors that people view as important in evaluating and accepting risks.

      7 Use comparisons, especially comparisons to regulatory or professional standards, to help put risk information in perspective, improve understanding of a risk, and improve the adoption of protective behaviors, but be careful of comparisons that ignore factors that people consider important in evaluating and accepting risks.

      8 Include a discussion of risk‐reduction and control actions, including what people can do to increase feelings of self‐efficacy and control or reduce their exposures to risks.

      9 Promise only what you can deliver with confidence and do what you promise; guarantee processes rather than outcomes.

      Research and analysis of case studies have shown that these principles and guidelines form the basic building blocks for effective risk communication. Each principle and guideline recognizes (differently) that effective risk communication is a process based on mutual trust, stakeholder engagement, and respect. Each principle and guideline also recognize that effective risk communication is central to informed decision‐making and is a complex art and skill that requires substantial knowledge, training, and practice.

      1 Risk communication is a science‐based discipline.

      2 High concern situations change the rules of communication.

      3 The key to risk communication success is anticipation, preparation, and practice (APP).

      4 Opinions about a risk or threat not addressed effectively can morph into unchangeable beliefs.

      5 People under stress:have difficulty hearing, understanding, and remembering informationwant to know that you care before they care what you knowfocus much more on negative informationfocus most of what they hear first and lastprocess information well below their educational levelactively seek out additional sources of information to reduce stress and risks,

      Below are additional resources to expand on the content presented in this chapter.

      1 Árvai, J., and Rivers, L. III., eds. (2014). Effective Risk Communication. London: Earthscan.

      2 Arvai, СКАЧАТЬ