Bentham. Michael Quinn
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Bentham - Michael Quinn страница 5

Название: Bentham

Автор: Michael Quinn

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Афоризмы и цитаты

Серия:

isbn: 9781509521944

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

      Names: Quinn, Michael, 1961- author.

      Title: Jeremy Bentham / Michael Quinn.

      Description: Medford, MA : Polity Press, 2022. | Series: Classic thinkers | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Summary: “An erudite introduction to the ideas of the father of utilitarianism”-- Provided by publisher.

      Identifiers: LCCN 2021015852 (print) | LCCN 2021015853 (ebook) | ISBN 9781509521906 (hardback) | ISBN 9781509521913 (paperback) | ISBN 9781509521920 (adobe pdf) | ISBN 9781509521944 (epub)

      Subjects: LCSH: Bentham, Jeremy, 1748-1832 | Utilitarianism.

      Classification: LCC B1574.B34 Q56 2022 (print) | LCC B1574.B34 (ebook) | DDC 192--dc23

      LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021015852

      LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2021015853

      by Fakenham Prepress Solutions, Fakenham, Norfolk NR21 8NL

      Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon

      The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.

      Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition.

      For further information on Polity, visit our website: politybooks.com

      This book is informed in part by fifteen years of teaching students at UCL about Bentham’s thought. I am grateful to them for asking questions to which I had no answers, and contributing in many ways to my understanding of that thought (though I still lack the answers to some of the questions). Another important source of learning has been the parallel editing of parts of Bentham’s corpus for the ongoing critical edition of his writings, The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham. I need to say a heartfelt thanks to Fred Rosen for giving me the opportunity to begin working on Bentham in 1993, and to Philip Schofield for renewing the opportunity in 2004.

      Over the years, many Bentham scholars have been generous with their time and energy in discussion, and in reading and commenting on arguments, and I can only hope that I have been equally obliging. Singling out individuals is always invidious, but I would like to express particular thanks to Jean-Pierre Cléro, Doug Long, Stephen Engelmann, David Lieberman and Peter Niesen. Xiaobo Zhai deserves special thanks for asking too many questions to which I had no convincing answers, and obliging me to think anew. The public policy focus of the book has been present since the beginning, but developed considerably in exhaustive discussions with Malik Bozzo-Rey and Angela Marciniak in 2019. I am very grateful to both, and I hope they are not too disappointed with the result.

      I am grateful to Tim Causer and Benjamin Bourcier, who gave helpful feedback on drafts of chapters, and to Chris Riley, who read the whole text and assisted with troublesome references. My greatest debt is to Angela Marciniak, who has been a never-failing source of support, encouragement and constructive challenge, and who commented on the chapters as they were drafted, while the missteps that remain are mine alone. I cannot begin to return adequate recompense for her friendship and support, but I can say that without it this book would not have seen the light of day.

      Parts of Chapters 3 and 4 originally appeared in a special issue of History of European Ideas, Indirect Legislation: Jeremy Bentham’s Regulatory Revolution (Bozzo-Rey, Brunon-Ernst and Quinn, 2017) (https://tandfonline.com). I am grateful to Taylor and Francis for permission to reproduce revised versions here.

      I need to say thank you to three referees who reviewed the draft carefully and who all improved it, and finally to record my appreciation for the tact, patience and skill of George Owers and Julia Davies at Polity: working with whom has been a pleasure.

      To have compleated the junction between interest and duty in every line of human conduct would be neither more nor less than to have brought the science and art of government to perfection – to have established a perfect system of legislation. (2010a: 353)

      The Bentham presented in this book is a Bentham who believed that the principle of utility was applicable in all contexts, but whose central focus was on the delivery of good outcomes by public institutions. In other words he was, above all, with Engelmann, a ‘theorist of the art and science of government’ (2017: 71), both in the sense that government was an engineer of the context in which its subjects made choices, and in the sense that the context in which government and its functionaries made choices was in large measure created by the choices of those same subjects. In the current crisis of political liberalism, this approach remains relevant, not to say urgent, across political communities (see Ch. 9: 171–4).

      It is true to say that once launched on the study of a topic, Bentham followed СКАЧАТЬ