Polymer Composites for Electrical Engineering. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Polymer Composites for Electrical Engineering - Группа авторов страница 26

СКАЧАТЬ 21 PEG/EVM/SiC nanowires[100] Physical blending and impregnation 3.29 wt% 64.93 0.53 96 PEG/epoxy/BN[101] Melt blending and curing 40 wt% 60.7 2.962 ~887 PEG/GO/BN[17] Solution blending 34 wt% 107.4 3.00 900 PEG/crosslinked cellulose ‐chitosan/BN[102] Interfacial polyelectrolyte complex spinning 47.4 wt% 48.3 4.005 2256 PEG/chitosan‐BN scaffold[103] Nondirectional freezing and vacuum impregnation 27 wt% 136.9 2.77 ~794 PEG/cellulose‐BN nanosheet scaffold[69] Vacuum impregnation 10 vol% 136.8 4.764 ~1344 PEG/GO‐BN scaffold[104] Nondirectional freezing and vacuum impregnation 19.2 wt% 145.9 1.84 479 PEG/aligned GO‐BN scaffold[66] Unidirectional freezing and vacuum impregnation 28.7 wt% 143.6 3.18 864 PEG/silver‐graphene[57] Solution blending 8 wt% 166.1 0.414 95 PEG/BN‐GNP[106] Solution blending 31 wt% 122.2 1.33 329

      where m is the mass, 𝛥H is the phase change enthalpy determined by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), U and I, respectively, represent the applied voltage and current, and t is phase change time.

      The majorities of the systems used to conduct electro‐to‐heat conversion are organic non‐polymeric solid–liquid PCMs. Leakage‐proof phase change composites composed of microcrystalline cellulose/GNPs aerogel and PEG have been reported. The conductive composites have the ability of electrical energy transition and release (Figure 2.7a).[95] When an electrical field is applied, electrical energy can be inverted into thermal energy by generating Joule heat. Once the accumulated heat reaches the phase transition temperature of working substance, phase change and heat storage behaviors occur. Likewise, shape‐stabilized PW‐based composites containing commercial melamine foam incorporated by GO and GNPs exhibited high electrical conductivity (2.787 S cm−1) at a filler loading of 4.89 wt% and efficient electro‐to‐heat conversion capacity with an efficiency of 62.5%.[113] In addition, Chen et al.[114] employed solid–solid PCMs to realize electro‐to‐thermal energy conversion. PEG was introduced into graphite foam and then in‐situ polymerized, giving rise to the formation of PU‐based solid–solid phase change composites. When a relatively low voltage of 1.2 or 1.4 V is applied, the phase change composites can complete the electro‐to‐heat conversion, and the estimated conversion efficiency is above 80%. Also, an efficient electro‐to‐heat conversion for PU‐based solid–solid phase change composites has been achieved after introducing electrically conductive graphene aerogel.[115, 116]

      2.4.2 Light‐to‐Heat Conversion

      Source: Wei et al. [95]. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier Ltd.

      (c) magnetism‐to‐heat.

      Source: Based on Wang et al. [107].

      (d) heat‐to‐electricity.

      Source: Jiang et al. [108]. Reproduced with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry

      and (e) photo‐to‐heat‐to‐electricity.

      Source: Yang et al. [105]. Reproduced with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.

      Note that carbon materials are mainly incorporated in the above‐mentioned electric‐driven phase change composites, and thus most of them can achieve electro‐to‐heat and light‐to‐heat conversions СКАЧАТЬ