Urban Remote Sensing. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Urban Remote Sensing - Группа авторов страница 31

Название: Urban Remote Sensing

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: География

Серия:

isbn: 9781119625858

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ results provided in Table 2.1 indicate moderate, positive relationships between the DSM product and the aggregated lidar data following application of the spatial trend (i.e. DSM vs. lidar trend). Statistical results show weak correlations between raw comparisons (i.e. DSM vs. lidar) and strong, positive correlations between trend to trend comparisons (i.e. DSM trend vs. lidar trend). The highest correlation values (i.e. DSM trend vs. lidar trend) were observed for Austin, TX (r2 = 0.98), Washington, DC (r2 = 0.98), and San Antonio, TX (r2 = 0.97; see Figure 2.11). Importantly, the direct, positive relationships are similarly predictive of built‐up volume in areas with low values (i.e. suburban, rural) as in areas with high values (i.e. downtown, industrial). As validated by building volume derived from lidar data with very limited availability in time and space, DSM can be applied for 3D monitoring of global urban areas (Nghiem et al. 2017; Mathews et al. 2019). Moreover, the linear relationship between DSM backscatter and 3D building volume holds true throughout the entire dynamic range of urban backscatter without a saturation effect (Mathews et al. 2019) either at the low limit (such as small wooden houses in residential areas) or the high end (such as steel skyscrapers in city centers). This implies that DSM can be used to estimate building volume density (i.e. the total build volume per pixel or per unit area) regardless of building size or type, or whether the total building volume consists of many small buildings or a few large buildings. Thereby, the DSM provides a simple approach applicable to various urban classes having different structural patterns without many confounding factors.

Photos depict city and data extents along with raw and processed data and polynomial trend visualizations for Tulsa, Oklahoma for 2008: (a) reference map, (b) 1 m lidar first-return DHM, (c) 1 km radar DSM, (d) 1 km aggregated lidar data (buildings only), (e) radar trend surface, and (f) lidar trend surface. Photos depict city and data extents along with raw and processed data and polynomial trend visualizations for San Antonio, Texas, for 2003: (a) reference map, (b) 1 m lidar last-return DHM, (c) 1 km radar DSM, (d) 1 km aggregated lidar data (buildings only), (e) radar trend surface, and (f) lidar trend surface.

      2.4.2.2 Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR)

      While DSM results are applicable to numerous urban issues at the scale of 1 km, other studies require higher spatial resolution in the range of 10–100 m to identify and delineate local features such as detection of buildings along roadsides, in small villages, and on small islands. In this regard, X‐band SAR data such as the current CSK, TerraSAR‐X (TSX) and TDX, and the future LOTUSat‐1 (LS1) and LOTUSat‐2 (LS2) platforms will serve to increase spatial and temporal resolutions of the data with more frequent observations when multiple SAR datasets are used synergistically.

      Here, we describe our theoretical approach for remote sensing of 3D urban building volume using satellite SAR data. The advancement here is that this new method can overcome and thus circumvent the limitation of Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) to determine building height as InSAR suffers from the overlay problem because buildings are typically constructed vertically (90° slope).

Schematic illustration of geometry of incidence and scattered fields.