The Nuremberg Trials (Vol.3). International Military Tribunal

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ . . .

      DR. STAHMER: Is it known to you that Admiral Canaris, in the first years of the war, had very active sabotage organizations behind the enemy front and that he personally worked very hard for these organizations?

      LAHOUSEN: Naturally I knew about that, and I have fully informed the American authorities who were interested in this subject.

      DR. STAHMER: But how is that possible? This would not be in conformity with his inner political beliefs.

      LAHOUSEN: This is explained by the fact that in the circle in which he was active he could never say what he really thought, and thousands of others could not do so either—what I said is a truth without saying. The essential thing is not what he said, or what he had to say in order to follow a purpose; but what he did and how he did it. This I know and others know it, too.

      DR. STAHMER: This is not a question of what he said, but of what he actually did. He not only proposed such measures, but also applied himself to their execution—is that true?

      LAHOUSEN: Ostensibly he had, of course, to remain within the limits of his office, in order to keep his position. That was the important thing, that he should remain in this position, to prevent in 1939 the thing that actually happened in 1944: that Himmler should take things in hand. I place before you these two men, one against the other: Canaris and Himmler—and I think I need hardly tell you what Canaris was striving for when he (Canaris) took part—ostensibly took part in these activities.

      DR. STAHMER: You mentioned the name of Himmler, in this connection, I would like to ask the following question:

      Is it known to you that Admiral Canaris, during the first years of the war, laid great stress on his good relations with the SS and the necessity for close co-operation with the SS, so much so, that the Defendant Göring had to advise him to be more independent of the SS in his military functions?

      THE PRESIDENT: You are going too quickly and I do not think you are observing what I said just now, that it will help the Tribunal if you will ask one question at a time.

      DR. STAHMER: I will put my question briefly; did the witness know that Admiral Canaris, during the first years of the war, had good connections with the SS and recognized the necessity for close co-operation with the formation, and never failed to stress this?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes, this is known to me. I also know why.

      DR. STAHMER: And why?

      LAHOUSEN: So that he might be in a position to see and to know and keep himself informed of everything these people were doing, and be able to intervene wherever and whenever possible.

      DR. STAHMER: Was it the duty of your organization, or the duty of Canaris’ department to pass on important enemy intelligence to the military leadership in good time?

      LAHOUSEN: I do not understand what the office of Canaris has to do with this?

      DR. STAHMER: Your section of the office of Canaris?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes, of course, the Department I.

      DR. STAHMER: Now, according to my information, your office did not pass on to the military departments concerned information of the Anglo-American landing in North Africa. Is that true?

      LAHOUSEN: I do not know. Please do not make me responsible for the department. This is a question which could easily be answered by Colonel Pieckenbrock, but not by me.

      DR. STAHMER: Regarding the Case “Rowehl,” you said yesterday that a colonel of the Air Force, Rowehl, had formed a special squadron, which had the tasks of making reconnaissance flights over Poland, England, and the southeast sector prior to the Polish campaign. Is that true?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes.

      DR. STAHMER: You also said that Colonel Rowehl went to see Admiral Canaris to report on the results of these flights and to submit photographs. Is that true?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes. How should I have known about it otherwise? I did not invent it.

      DR. STAHMER: I did not say that. How did Colonel Rowehl come to report to Admiral Canaris about this?

      LAHOUSEN: I believe I mentioned yesterday, that this was a function of the Amt Ausland Abwehr, Abteilung I.

      DR. STAHMER: Have you yourself seen the photographs that were taken over England?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes, I have seen them.

      DR. STAHMER: When and where were these pictures shown to you?

      LAHOUSEN: In the office of Canaris they were shown to me. I had nothing to do with them in an official way. I happened to be present at the time. I was interested in seeing what was going on.

      DR. STAHMER: What did these photographs show?

      LAHOUSEN: I have forgotten the details. They were photographs taken from airplanes.

      DR. STAHMER: The photographs were not shown to you officially?

      LAHOUSEN: No, the photographs were not shown to me officially, I was merely an interested spectator on this occasion, as I have just told you.

      DR. STAHMER: Did Rowehl give any written reports about these flights to the Amt?

      LAHOUSEN: I do not know.

      DR. STAHMER: You do not know? You also said that Rowehl’s squadron made flights from Budapest?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes.

      DR. STAHMER: Do you know that from your own experience or from some other information?

      LAHOUSEN: I know it through personal investigation. The date is entered in the War Diary kept by the section. At that time I was in Budapest, and I was asked to attend the conferring of a citation in Budapest.

      DR. STAHMER: That was before the Polish campaign?

      LAHOUSEN: Yes.

      DR. STAHMER: And why were these flights carried out from Budapest?

      LAHOUSEN: I do not know. I said that yesterday. A gentleman of the Air Force would have to answer that.

      DR. RUDOLF DIX (Counsel for Defendant Schacht): Witness, do you know Captain Strünck from the Abwehr?

      LAHOUSEN: I would like you to tell me something more than the name. The name alone does not mean anything to me. Give me a few points that will refresh my memory.

      DR. DIX: He is a lawyer who was a reserve officer with the Abwehr. I do not know in which department, but I would say it was in the department of Pieckenbrock. However, if you do not know him I will not question you any further.

      LAHOUSEN: If he was with Pieckenbrock I do not know him. I knew a few. Is Strünck still alive?

      DR. DIX: No, he is no longer living.

      LAHOUSEN: Was he executed?

      DR. DIX: He suffered the same death as Canaris and Oster. For the information of the Court, I should like to add that I asked this question because I named Strünck СКАЧАТЬ