The Great Debate That Made the U.S. Constitution. Madison James
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Great Debate That Made the U.S. Constitution - Madison James страница 19

Название: The Great Debate That Made the U.S. Constitution

Автор: Madison James

Издательство: Bookwire

Жанр: Документальная литература

Серия:

isbn: 9788027241040

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ by the Legislature, and for making him absolutely dependent on that body, as it was the will of that which was to be executed. An independence of the Executive on the supreme Legislature, was in his opinion the very essence of tyranny if there was any such thing.

      Mr. Wilson moves that the blank for the term of duration should be filled with three years, observing at the same time that he preferred this short period, on the supposition that a re-eligibility would be provided for.

      Mr. Pinkney moves for seven years.

      Mr. Sherman was for three years, and against the doctrine of rotation as throwing out of office the men best qualified to execute its duties.

      Mr. Mason was for seven years at least, and for prohibiting a re-eligibility as the best expedient both for preventing the effect of a false complaisance on the side of the Legislature towards unfit characters; and a temptation on the side of the Executive to intrigue with the Legislature for a re-appointment.

      On the question for seven years,

      Massachusetts dividd. Connecticut no. N. Y. ay. N. J. ay. Pennsylvania ay. Del. ay. Virginia ay. N. C. no. S. C. no. Geor. no.

      There being 5 ays, 4 noes, & 1 divd, a question was asked whether a majority had voted in the Affirmative? The President decided that it was an affirmative vote.

      The mode of appointing the Executive was the next question.

      Mr. Wilson renewed his declarations in favor of an appointment by the people. He wished to derive not only both branches of the Legislature from the people, without the intervention of the State Legislatures but the Executive also; in order to make them as independent as possible of each other, as well as of the States;

      Col. Mason favors the idea, but thinks it impracticable. He wishes however that Mr. Wilson might have time to digest it into his own form. — the clause, "to be chosen by the National Legislature" — was accordingly postponed. —

      Mr. Rutlidge suggests an election of the Executive by the second branch only of the national Legislature.

      The Committee then rose and the House

      Adjourned.

      According to King, Madison followed Wilson: "Madison agreed with Wilson in the Definition of Executive power. Ex vi termini. Executive power does not include the Power of War and Peace. Executive Power shd. be limited and defined. If large, we shall have the Evils of Elective Monarchies. Perhaps the best plan will be a single Executive of long duration, with a Council and with Liberty to dissent on his personal Responsibility." — King's Life and Correspondence of Rufus King, i., 588.

      According to Pierce:

      "Mr. Madison was of opinion that an Executive formed of one Man would answer the purpose when aided by a Council, who should have the right to advise and record their proceedings, but not to control his authority." — Pierce's Notes, Am. Hist. Rev., iii., 320.

      King gives Gerry's remarks: "Gerry. I am in favor of a Council to advise the Executive: they will be organs of information respecting Persons qualified for various offices. Their opinions may be recorded, so as to be liable to be called to account & impeached — in this way, their Responsibility will be certain, and for misconduct their Punishment sure."

      Dickinson followed Gerry: "Dickinson. A limited yet vigorous Executive is not republican, but peculiar to monarchy — the royal Executive has vigour, not only by power, but by popular Attachment & Report — an Equivalent to popular Attachment may be derived from the Veto on the Legislative acts. We cannot have a limited monarchy — our condition does not permit it. Republics are in the beginning and for a time industrious, but they finally destroy themselves because they are badly constituted. I dread the consolidation of the States, & hope for a good national Govt. from the present Division of the States with a feeble Executive.

      "We are to have a Legislature of two branches, or two Legislatures, as the sovereign of the nation — this will work a change unless you provide that the judiciary shall aid and correct the Executive. The first Branch of the Legislature, the H. of Representatives, must be on another plan. The second Branch or Senate may be on the present scheme of representing the States — the Representatives to be apportioned according to the Quotas of the States paid into the general Treasury. The Executive to be removed from office by the national Legislature, on the Petition of seven States." — King's Life and Correspondence of Rufus King, i., 588 et seq.

      Saturday June 2d in Committee of Whole

       Table of Contents

      William Samuel Johnson from Connecticut, Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer, from Maryland, & John Lansing Jr. from N. York, took their seats.

      It was moved & seconded to postpone the Resol: of Mr. Randolph respecting the Executive, in order to take up the 2d branch of the Legislature; which being negatived by Mas: Con: Del: Virg: N. C. S. C. Geo: against N. Y. Pennsylvania Maryland. The mode of appointing the Executive was resumed.

      Mr. Wilson made the following motion, to be substituted for the mode proposed by Mr. Randolph's resolution, "that the Executive СКАЧАТЬ