Cultural Algorithms. Robert G. Reynolds
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Cultural Algorithms - Robert G. Reynolds страница 8

Название: Cultural Algorithms

Автор: Robert G. Reynolds

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Программы

Серия:

isbn: 9781119403104

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ www.wiley.com.

       Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data:

      Names: Reynolds, Robert G., author.

      Title: Cultural algorithms : tools to model complex dynamic social systems / Robert G. Reynolds.

      Description: Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, [2020] | Series: IEEE Press series on computational intelligence | Includes bibliographical references and index.

      Identifiers: LCCN 2020001817 (print) | LCCN 2020001818 (ebook) | ISBN 9781119403081 (hardback) | ISBN 9781119403098 (adobe pdf) | ISBN 9781119403104 (epub)

      Subjects: LCSH: Social systems–Mathematical models. | Culture–Mathematical models. | Algorithms. | Social intelligence. | Computational intelligence.

      Classification: LCC H61.25 .R49 2020 (print) | LCC H61.25 (ebook) | DDC 300.1/5181–dc23

      LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020001817 LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020001818

      Cover Design: Wiley

      Cover Image: © engel.ac/Shutterstock

      Anas AL-Tirawi Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

      Rami Alazrai Department of Computer Engineering, German Jordanian University, Amman, Jordan

      Mostafa Z. Ali Department of Computer Information Systems, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

      Mohammad I. Daoud Department of Computer Engineering, German Jordanian University, Amman, Jordan

      Samuel Dustin Stanley Computer Science Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

      Mehdi Kargar Ted Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada

      Khalid Kattan Computer Science Department, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

      Leonard Kinnaird-Heether Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

      Ziad Kobti School of Computer Science, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada

      Thomas Palazzolo Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

      Robert G. Reynolds Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA The Museum of Anthropological Archaeology, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

      Faisal Waris Department of Computer Science, College of Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

      About the Companion Website

      This book is accompanied by a companion website:

       www.wiley.com/go/CAT

      The website includes:

       Supplementary materials

       Robert G. Reynolds

       Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA

       The Museum of Anthropological Archaeology, University of Michigan‐Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

      By and large, most approaches to machine learning focus on the solution of a specific problem in the context of an existing system. Cultural Algorithms are a knowledge‐intensive framework that is based on how human cultural systems adjust their structures and contents to address changes in their environments [1]. These changes can produce a solution to the new problem within the existing social framework. Beyond that, the system can adapt its framework in order to produce the solution for a larger class of related problems. Cultural Algorithms are able to mimic this behavior by the self‐adaptation of its’ knowledge and population components.

      In other words, we are participating in the Cultural learning process right now. However, as part of the process it is hard to assess what progress, if any, is being made by the system. The Cultural Algorithm provides a framework by which we can step outside of the system so that we can assess its trajectories more clearly. This issue is addressed somewhat by the notion of “human‐centric” learning. However, such an approach suggests that we are ultimately in control of the learning activities. In reality, we are embedded in a performance environment that we have partially created on the one hand, and have been passed down as the result of millions of years of evolution on the other.

      The results of agent interaction within the performance environment in which they are embedded can be accepted into the Belief Space. The Belief Space is a repository of the knowledge acquired by the system so far. It is viewed as a network of different knowledge sources. The accepted knowledge is then integrated into the network through the use of learning procedures that make focused adjustments to the cultural compendium of knowledge. The Information “cloud” can be viewed as the current manifestation of the Belief Space using current technology.