Auditing Employee Benefit Plans. Josie Hammond
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Auditing Employee Benefit Plans - Josie Hammond страница 27

СКАЧАТЬ the scope of FASB ASC 960, 962, and 965, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities that are not public business entities may adopt the amendments in this ASU earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Otherwise early adoption is limited to specific amendments, available only under certain conditions and subject to specific early adoption guidance.

      FASB ASU No. 2018-03

      In February 2018, FASB issued FASB ASU No. 2018-03, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.

      Definition of nonpublic entity

      FASB issued ASU No. 2013-12, Definition of a Public Business Entity: An Addition to the Master Glossary. This update amends the Master Glossary of the FASB ASC to include one definition of public business entity for future use in GAAP. An assessment of whether an organization is a public business entity is based on meeting any one of several criteria including whether the entity is required to file or furnish financial statements (including voluntary filers) with the SEC, or has securities that are traded, listed, or quoted on an exchange or an OTC market.

      In addition, the new definition excluded employee benefit plans within the scope of FASB ASC 960 through 965 on plan accounting.

      A nonpublic entity is currently defined by the FASB ASC glossary (as related to FASB ASC 820) as an entity that does not meet any of the following conditions:

      1 Its debt or equity securities trade in a public market either on a stock exchange (domestic or foreign) or in an over-the-counter market, including securities quoted only locally or regionally.

      2 It is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public market (a domestic or foreign stock exchange or an over-the-counter market, including local or regional markets).

      3 It files with a regulatory agency in preparation for the sale of any class of debt or equity securities in a public market.

      4 It is required to file or furnish financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

      5 It is controlled by an entity covered by criteria (a) through ( d ) .

      Under the existing definition, a benefit plan controlled by a public sponsor (even if the plan itself does not file a Form 11-K) might be considered public for purposes of the public entity disclosures.

      The FASB Private Company Council decided not to amend the existing definitions of a nonpublic entity at this time. The existing definitions will remain in the FASB ASC until potentially amended at a later date by FASB.

      Help desk. Subsequent to the issuance of this ASU, the term public business entity has been used to establish effective dates and disclosure requirements. This has created attention to the definition of a public business entity that had not previously existed. Therefore, in October 2017, the AICPA issued Technical Question and Answer sections 7100.01–7100.16, which address questions regarding the definition of a public business entity.

      Plan accounting: Master trust reporting—FASB ASU No. 2017-06

      In February 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-06, Plan Accounting: Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960); Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962); Health and Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): Employee Benefit Plan Master Trust Reporting.

      This ASU includes the following changes reporting and disclosure requirements for plans with master trusts:

       All plans should present their interest in the master trust and change in interest in the master trust as single line items in the statement of net assets available for benefits and the statement of changes in net assets available for benefits.

       All plans should provide the dollar amount of the plan’s interest in each general type of investment held by the master trust, which would supplement the existing GAAP requirement for a plan to disclose the master trust’s balances in each of those investments, by general type.

       All plans should disclose the master trust’s other assets and liabilities, as well as the dollar amount of the plan’s interest in each of those assets and liabilities.

       The current GAAP requirement to disclose, for plans with a divided interest in a master trust, the plan’s overall percentage in the master trust, is removed in order to avoid requiring redundant information.

       A health and welfare plan is not required to provide investment disclosures for 401(h) account assets because those disclosures are required to be provided within the defined benefit pension plan financial statements. However, the EITF decided to require the disclosure of the defined pension plan name within the health and welfare benefit plan so that all users can access the investment disclosure information relating to the 401(h) accounts, if desired.

      ASU No. 2017-06 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the amendments shall be applied retrospectively to all periods presented.

      Participants are encouraged to consult the full text of ASU No. 2017-06 on FASB’s website at www.fasb.org.

      Codification Improvements – FASB ASU No. 2018-09

      In July 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-09, Codification Improvements. The amendments in FASB ASU No. 2018-09 represent changes to clarify, correct errors in, or make minor improvements to FASB ASC. Among the amendments, an illustration in ASC 962 was modified. The ASU stated the following: “The amendment to Subtopic 962-325 in this Update removes the stable value common collective trust fund from the illustrative example in paragraph 962-325- 55-17 to avoid the interpretation that such an investment would never have a readily determinable fair value and, therefore, would always use the net asset value per share as practical expedient. Rather, a plan should evaluate whether a readily determinable fair value exists to determine whether those investments may qualify for the practical expedient to measure at net asset value in accordance with Topic 820.”