Totalitarianism. David D. Roberts

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ it for reasons that seem merely tendentious or short-sighted. If we keep a more open mind, we might see how a recast notion of totalitarianism can better interpret new researches like those organized by Geyer and Fitzpatrick and David-Fox, deepen our understanding of the three earlier regimes, and illuminate more recent phenomena as well.

In any case, we must think of totalitarianism simply as an aspiration and direction, not as some system that could ever be completely realized. If it is to be appropriately flexible, moreover, totalitarianism cannot be confined by a formal definition or checklist. But we already have a working conception, including statist intervention and total mobilization, and we will find additional characteristics indicating a novel mode of collective action, emerging early in chapter 3.

The scope for learning from experience

      For decades, the failures of the earlier totalitarian experiments bred confidence in the superiority of liberal democracy and a concomitant assumption that totalitarianism could never recur from within the western mainstream. But in the volatile world of the twenty-first century, we are less prone to such complacent liberal triumphalism. There are obviously those today who reject the whole panoply of liberal values and procedures and, on that basis, support movements or regimes we find troubling. Insofar as we seek to prevent any recurrence of totalitarianism in the West, surely we can learn by better engaging the earlier phenomena labeled totalitarian. The question is how we do so most fruitfully. What understanding of totalitarianism might better serve that aim?

      Writing in 1967, the noted American intellectual Irving Howe asserted that none of the theorists of totalitarianism could tell us the “ultimate purpose” of the Nazis or Stalinists. Howe doubted that such questions could presently be answered and suggested that perhaps they were not even genuine problems: “A movement in which terror and irrationality play so great a role may finally have no goal beyond terror and irrationality; to search for an ultimate end that can be significantly related to its immediate activity may itself be a rationalist fallacy.”¹⁰ We assume that there had to have been a reason, in other words, and we may be tempted to make one up.

It is useful to be reminded of this possible fallacy, but Howe, in relying so heavily on terror and irrationality, was falling into essentialism and teleological thinking, enduring pitfalls that we will consider in the ensuing chapters. Thus he was too quick to give up on the possibility of historical understanding. The way out is simply to engage our subjects more deeply and to probe more deeply into the history that connects them with us. From within such a framework, we can better understand origins, assess responsibility, honor the victims, and serve the worthy aim of “never again.”

Notes

1 Tzvetan Todorov, Hope and Memory (London: Atlantic, 2003), 2. 2 Karl W. Deutsch, “Cracks in the Monolith: Possibilities and Patterns of Disintegration in Totalitarian Systems,” in Carl J. Friedrich (ed.), Totalitarianism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954), 309. 3 Mao Zedong’s name was rendered in English as Mao Tse-tung before the reform of the transliteration of the Chinese language in 1982, so he is referred to by that name in older works. 4 Evelyn Cameron: Pictures from a Worthy Life (Montana PBS; Missoula: University of Montana, 2005). 5 Anna Burns, Milkman: A Novel (Minneapolis: Graywolf Press, 2018), 25, 120, 172. 6 Masha Gessen, The Future is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia (New York: Riverhead, 2017). 7 Michael Geyer and Sheila Fitzpatrick (eds), Beyond Totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism Compared (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009). 8 Michael David-Fox, Introduction to Michael David-Fox, Peter Holquist, and Alexander M. Martin (eds), Fascination and Enmity: Russia and Germany as Entangled Histories, 1914–1945 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2012), 3. 9 Richard Overy, The Dictators: Hitler’s Germany and Stalin’s Russia (New York: Norton, 2004), xxvii, 73. 10Irving Howe, Politics and the Novel (New York: Meridian, 1987 [1967]), 249–50.

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEBLAEsAAD/7RNaUGhvdG9zaG9wIDMuMAA4QklNBAQAAAAAABEcAgAAAgAA HAIFAAVQcmludAA4QklNBCUAAAAAABDXClAVvwwrBfq+PF4I1IEBOEJJTQPtAAAAAAAQASwAAAAB AAIBLAAAAAEAAjhCSU0EJgAAAAAADgAAAAAAAAAAAAA/gAAAOEJJTQQNAAAAAAAEAAAAHjhCSU0E GQAAAAAABAAAAB44QklNA/MAAAAAAAkAAAAAAAAAAAEAOEJJTScQAAAAAAAKAAEAAAAAAAAAAjhC SU0D9QAAAAAASAAvZmYAAQBsZmYABgAAAAAAAQAvZmYAAQChmZoABgAAAAAAAQAyAAAAAQBaAAAA BgAAAAAAAQA1AAAAAQAtAAAABgAAAAAAAThCSU0D+AAAAAAAcAAA//////////////////////// /////wPoAAAAAP////////////////////////////8D6AAAAAD///////////////////////// ////A+gAAAAA////////////////////

СКАЧАТЬ