Electron Transfer. Shunichi Fukuzumi

Чтение книги онлайн.

Figure 4.6 Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of (a) tAlMCM‐41 and (b) sAlMCM‐41 (the high‐resolution image of tAlMCM‐41 is inserted in (a)). (c) Reaction scheme of photocatalytic oxygenation of p‐xylene with Acr⁺–Mes and [(tmpa)Cu^II]²⁺ incorporated into sAlMCM‐41.

      Source: Fukuzumi et al. 2012 [73]. Reproduced with permission of PNAS.

The triplet ET state of Acr^·–Mes^·+@tAlMCM‐41 was detected by an EPR spectrum measured at 4 K, which exhibited a fine structure together with a strong sharp signal at g = 4.0 [73]. The distance between two electron spins was determined from the zero‐field splitting parameters to be 7.7 Å, which agrees with the expected distance of 7.2 Å between an sp² carbon atom at the 4 position of the mesityl moiety and sp² carbon atoms at the 3 and 6 positions of the acridinyl moiety [73]. Polycondensation of Acr⁺–Mes‐bridged organosilane in the presence of a nonionic surfactant is also reported to yield a mesostructured organosilica solid with a functional framework that exhibited long‐lived photoinduced CS [75].

      Nano‐sized charge‐separated molecules can also be obtained by using single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) [76], which exhibit excellent chemical and physical properties as revealed by various potential applications [77–81]. Extensive efforts have so far been devoted to assemble electron donor and acceptor molecules on SWNTs [82–88]. However, the fine control of size (i.e. length) of SWNTs remains a formidable challenge, because SWNTs have seamless cylindrical structures made up of a hexagonal carbon network, which leads to the difficulty of solubilization/functionalization without treatment with strong acid or vigorous sonication [89–92]. On the other hand, the cup‐stacked carbon nanotubes (CSCNTs) that consist of cup‐shaped nanocarbon (CNC) units, which stack via van der Waals attractions, have merited special attention from the viewpoint of the conventional carbon nanotube alternatives [93–96]. The tube–tube van der Waals energy between CNCs has been counterbalanced by the thermal or photoinduced electron transfer multi‐electron reduction due to electrostatic repulsion, resulting in the highly dispersible CNCs with size homogeneity [97,98].

The CNCs with controlled size have been functionalized with a large number of porphyrin molecules [99]. The general procedure for the synthesis of the porphyrin‐functionalized cup‐shaped nanocarbons [CNC–(H₂P)_n] is shown in Figure 4.7a [99]. The CNCs are first functionalized with aniline as the precursor for further functionalization with porphyrins. The aniline‐functionalized nanocarbons react with the porphyrin derivatives to construct the nanohybrids.

      The structure of the CNCs of the CNC–(H₂P)_n nanohybrids is shown by the TEM in Figure 4.7b, which reveals a CNC with a hollow core along the length of the nanocup with well‐controlled diameter (c. 50 nm) and size (c. 100 nm) [99]. The weight percentage of porphyrins attached to the CNCs was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and elemental analysis to be ca. 20% [99]. This corresponds to one functional group per 640 carbon atoms of the nanocup framework for CNC–(H₂P)_n nanohybrid. Thus, the π‐framework of the CNC is not destroyed despite attachment of a large number of porphyrin molecules on the CNC.

      Spectroscopic evidence for the covalent functionalization of CNC–(H₂P)_n nanohybrid was obtained by an intensity increase of the Raman signal at 1353 cm⁻¹ (D band) in the functionalized CNC as compared with the pristine CSCNTs [99], because the D band has been used for monitoring the process of functionalization that transforms sp² to sp³ sites [99]. The UV–vis absorption spectrum of CNC–(H₂P)_n nanohybrid agreed with that of the superposition of ref‐H₂P [tetrakis(N‐octadecyl‐4‐aminocarboxyphenyl)porphyrin] and CNCs, indicating that there is no significant interaction between attached porphyrins and CSCNTs in the ground states [99].

The fluorescence lifetime of CNC–(H₂P)_n was determined to be 3.0 ± 0.1 ns, which is much shorter than that of ref‐H₂P (14.1 ± 0.1 ns) [99]. The fluorescence emission at 650 nm was also quenched in CNC–(H₂P)_n [99]. The short fluorescence lifetime of CNC–(H₂P)_n and an efficient fluorescence quenching of porphyrins in CNC–(H₂P)_n as compared to the ref‐H₂P may result from the photoinduced electron transfer from the singlet excited state of H₂P (¹H₂P^*) to CNC in CNC–(H₂P)_n. The occurrence of photoinduced electron transfer to afford the charge‐separated (CS) state of CNC–(H₂P)_n was confirmed by nanosecond laser flash photolysis measurements in Figure 4.8, where the absorption bands in the visible and near infrared (NIR) regions are attributed to H₂P^·+, which are clearly different from the triplet–triplet absorption of ref‐H₂P [99]. The formation of the CS state was also confirmed by EPR measurements under photoirradiation of CNC–(H₂P)_n in frozen N,N‐diemthylformamide (DMF) at 153 K. The observed isotropic EPR signal at g = 2.0044 agrees with that of ref‐H₂P^·+ produced by one‐electron oxidation with [Ru(bpy)₃]³⁺ (bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine) in deaerated CHCl₃ [99]. The EPR signal corresponding to the reduced carbon‐based nanomaterials was too broad to be СКАЧАТЬ