Centrality of Style, The. Группа авторов

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ oeuvre, see Lester Faigley’s Fragments of Rationality: Postmodernity and the Subject of Composition.

      23.See Warschauer’s and Banks’s multiple accesses; Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury’s multiple digital divides; and Selber’s muliliteracies.

      24.For further information on shopdropping and other culture jamming examples see: www.woostercollective.com.

      References

      Aristotle (1991). On rhetoric. (Kennedy, G. A., Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      Augustine. Confessions and Enchiridion. (Outler, A. C. Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.ccel.org/ccel/augustine/confessions.toc.html

      Augustine (2008). Book IV: De doctrina christiana. In Enos, R. L. & Thompson, R. et al. (Eds.), The Rhetoric of St. Augustine of Hippo: De Doctrina Christiana and the Search for a Distinctly Christian Rhetoric (pp. 33-183). Waco: Baylor University Press.

      Banks, A. J. (2006). Race, rhetoric, and technology: Searching for higher ground. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

      Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge: MIT Press

      Burke, K. (1968). Language as symbolic action: Essays of life, literature, and method. Berkley: University of California Press.

      Burke, K. (1984). Permanence and change (3rd ed.). Berkley: University of California Press.

      Cage, J. (1992). Listen [DVD].

      Carlo, R. (2013). Jim Corder’s reflective ethos as alternative to traditional argument: Style’s revivification of the writer-reader relationship. In M. Duncan & S. Vanguri (Eds.), The centrality of style. Fort Collins, CO/Anderson, SC: The WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press.

      Castiglione, B. (2000). The book of the courtier (Opdycke, L. E., Trans.). Herfordshire: Wordsworth.

      Delagrange, S. H. (2009). Wunderkammer, Cornell, and the visual canon of arrangement. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy. 13(2). Retrieved from http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/delagrange/index.html

      De Man, P. (1982). Hegel on the sublime. In M. Krupnick (Ed.), Displacement: Derrida and after (pp. 139-153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

      Erasmus, D. De copia.

      Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical theory of technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      Foucault, M. (1980). The confessions of the flesh. In Colin Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings 1972-1977. New York: Random House.

      Foucault, M. (1990) The history of sexuality: Volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.

      Gass, W. H. (1997). Finding a form: Essays by William H. Gass. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

      Guerlac, S. (1985). Longinus and the subject of the sublime. New Literary History 16(2), 275-289. JSTOR. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/468747

      Klosterman, C. (2003). Sex, drugs, and cocoa puffs: A low culture manifesto. New York: Scribner.

      Lamb, J. (1993). Longinus, the dialectic, and the practice of mastery. English Literary History 60(3), 545-567. JSTOR. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2873404

      Lanham, R. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

      Lanham, R. (2007). Revising prose (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

      Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Cambridge: MITP.

      McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Critical Edition. (W. Terrence Gordon, Ed.). Corte Madera: Gingko P, 2003.

      Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & Stansbury, M. (2003). Virtual inequality beyond the digital divide. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.

      Russell, D. A. & Winterbottom, M. (Eds.) (1972). Classical literary criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      Schilb, J. (2007). Rhetorical refusals: Defying audience’s expectations. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

      Schroeder, C., Fox, H., & Bizzell, P. (Eds.). (2002). Alt dis: Alternative discourses and the academy. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

      Selber, S. (2004). Multiliteracies for a digital age. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

      Selfe, C L., & Selfe, R. J., Jr. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication 45(4), 480-504.

      Shakespeare, W. (1997). The tragedy of Julius Caesar. The Riverside Shakespeare: The complete works (2nd ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.

      Sirc, G. (2004). Box-Logic. Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition. Logan: Utah State University Press.

      Strunk, W, & White, E. B. (1979). The elements of style (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

      Sutherland, C. M. (2004). Augustine, ethos, and the integrative nature of Christian rhetoric. Rhetor 1, 1-18.

      Sutherland, J. (1957). On English prose. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

      Swartz, L. (1998). Why people hate the paperclip: Labels, appearance, behavior, and social responses to user interface agents. Stanford University. Retrieved from http://xenon.stanford.edu/~lswartz/paperclip/

      Warshauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge: MIT Press.

      Weathers, W. (2010). Grammars of style: New options in composition. In P. Butler (Ed.), Style in rhetoric and composition: A critical sourcebook (pp. 219-238). New York: Bedford/St. Martins.

      Williams, J. (2007). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (9th ed.). New York: Pearson.

      Williams, J. (1981). The phenomenology of error. College Composition and Communication 32(2), 152-68.

      Wysocki, A. F. (2004). Opening new media to writing: Openings & justifications. Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition (pp. 1-41). Logan: Utah State University Press.

      Wysocki, A. F & Johnson-Eilola, J. (1999). Blinded by the Letter: Why are we using literacy as a metaphor for everything else? In G. E. Hawisher & C. Selfe (Eds.), Passions, pedagogies, and 21st Century technologies (pp. 349-368). Logan: Utah State University Press.

      Stylistic Sandcastles: Rhetorical Figures as Composition’s Bucket and Spade

      William FitzGerald

      Rutgers

      For all a rhetorician’s rules teach nothing but to name his tools.

      — Samuel Butler, Hudibras

      Aposiopesis? Metalepsis? Zeugma? What did my students think when first introduced to these and other terms? I know because they told СКАЧАТЬ