Collected Letters Volume Three: Narnia, Cambridge and Joy 1950–1963. Walter Hooper
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Collected Letters Volume Three: Narnia, Cambridge and Joy 1950–1963 - Walter Hooper страница 37

СКАЧАТЬ many thanks and all the best wishes to you and your mother for 1951,

      yours sincerely,

      C. S. Lewis

      

       TO SARAH NEYIAN (W): TS

      RER60/51.

      Magdalen College,

      Oxford. 26th January 1951.

      My dear Sarah

      I also have just had ‘flu or I’d write more. Love to all.

      Your affectionate Godfather,

      C. S. Lewis

      

       TO ARTHUR GREEVES (BOD):

      Magdalen etc

      31/1/51

      My dear Arthur

      Minto died a fortnight ago. Please pray for her soul.

      Yours

      Jack

      

      Magdalen College

      Oxford 31/1/51

      My dear Roger

      What two nights can you come to me? I prefer not a week end if you can possibly manage it. I suggest Feb 28 & 29th. (Feb 13, 20 & March 2nd no good). I miss you v. much. Love & duty to all of you.

      Yours

      Jack

      

       TO MRS HALMBACHER(WHL):

      Magdalen College,

      January 1951

      Dear Mrs Halmbacher

      How very kind of you. This is absolutely the present I wanted, for the nuisance and waste of time of finding that one has’nt got an envelope at a critical moment is serious…

       TO MARY VAN DEUSEN (W):

      Magdalen College

      Oxford 7/2/51

      Dear Mrs. Van Deusen

      If ‘planning’ is taken in the literal sense of thinking before one acts and acting on what one has thought out to the best of one’s ability, then of course planning is simply the traditional virtue of Prudence and not only compatible with, but demanded by, Christian ethics. But if the word is used (as I think you use it) to mean some particular politico-social programme, such as that of the present British Govt, then one cd. only say after examining that programme in detail. I don’t think I have studied it enough to do that. As for the ‘planning’ involved in your social work I am of course even less qualified.

      It is certainly not wrong to try to remove the natural consequences of sin provided the means by which you remove them are not in themselves another sin. (E.g. it is merciful and Christian to remove the natural consequences of fornication by giving the girl a bed in a maternity ward and providing for the child’s keep and education, but wrong to remove them by abortion or infanticide). Perhaps the enclosed article (I don’t want it back) will make the point clearer.

      Where benevolent planning, armed with political or economic power, can become wicked is when it tramples on people’s rights for the sake of their good.

      Your letter gave me great pleasure: you are apparently on the right road. With all blessings.

      Yours sincerely

      C. S. Lewis

      

      Magdalen etc.

      28/2/51

      Dear Doctor Spencer