Literary and General Lectures and Essays. Charles Kingsley

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ lying, when he represents the great universe as turned to his small set of Pan’s pipes and all the more because he feels that, conceal it as he will, those same Pan’s pipes are out of tune with each other.  And so arises the habit of impersonating nature, not after the manner of Spenser (whose purity of metaphor and philosophic method, when he deals with nature, is generally even more marvellous than the richness of his fancy), as an organic whole, but in her single and accidental phenomena; and of ascribing not merely animal passions or animal enjoyment, but human discursive intellect and moral sense, to inanimate objects, and talking as if a stick or a stone were more of a man than the poet is—as indeed they very often may be.

      These, like everything else, are perfectly right in their own place—where they express passion, either pleasurable or painful, passion, that is, not so intense as to sink into exhaustion, or to be compelled to self-control by the fear of madness.  In these two cases, as great dramatists know well enough, the very violence of the emotion produces perfect simplicity, as the hurricane blows the sea smooth.  But where fanciful language is employed to express the extreme of passion, it is felt to be absurd, and is accordingly called rant and bombast: and where it is not used to express passion at all, but merely the quiet and normal state of the poet’s mind, or of his characters, with regard to external nature; when it is considered, as it is by most of our modern poets, the staple of poetry, indeed poetic diction itself, so that the more numerous and the stranger conceits an author can cram into his verses, the finer poet he is; then, also, it is called rant and bombast, but of the most artificial, insincere, and (in every sense of the word) monstrous kind; the offspring of an effeminate nature-worship, without self-respect, without true manhood, because it exhibits the poet as the puppet of his own momentary sensations, and not as a man superior to nature, claiming his likeness to the Author of nature, by confessing and expressing the permanent laws of Nature, undisturbed by fleeting appearances without, or fleeting tempers within.  Hence it is that, as in all insincere and effete times, the poetry of the day deals more and more with conceits, and less and less with true metaphors.  In fact, hinc illæ lachrymæ.  This is, after all, the primary symptom of disease in the public taste, which has set us on writing this review—that critics all round are crying: “An ill-constructed whole, no doubt; but full of beautiful passages”—the word “passages” turning out to mean, in plain English, conceits.  The simplest distinction, perhaps, between an image and a conceit is this—that while both are analogies, the image is founded on an analogy between the essential properties of two things—the conceit on an analogy between its accidents.  Images, therefore, whether metaphors or similes, deal with laws; conceits with private judgments.  Images belong to the imagination, the power which sees things according to their real essence and inward life, and conceits to the fancy or phantasy, which only see things as they appear.

      To give an example or two from the “Life Drama:”

      His heart holds a deep hope,

      As holds the wretched West the sunset’s corse—

      Spit on, insulted by the brutal rains.

      The passion-panting sea

      Watches the unveiled beauty of the stars

      Like a great hungry soul.

      Great spirits,

      Who left upon the mountain-tops of Death

      A light that made them lovely.

      The moon,

      Arising from dark waves which plucked at her.

      And hundreds, nay, thousands more in this book, whereof it must be said, that beautiful or not, in the eyes of the present generation—and many of them are put into very beautiful language, and refer to very beautiful natural objects—they are not beautiful really and in themselves, because they are mere conceits; the analogies in them are fortuitous, depending not on the nature of the things themselves, but on the private fancy of the writer, having no more real and logical coherence than a conundrum or a pun; in plain English, untrue, only allowable to Juliets or Othellos; while their self-possession, almost their reason, is in temporary abeyance under the influence of joy or sorrow.  Every one must feel the exquisite fitness of Juliet’s “Gallop apace, ye fiery-footed steeds,” etc., for one of her character, in her circumstances: every one, we trust, and Mr. Smith among the number, will some day feel the exquisite unfitness of using such conceits as we have just quoted, or any other, page after page, for all characters and chances.  For the West is not wretched; the rains never were brutal yet, and do not insult the sun’s corpse, being some millions of miles nearer us than the sun, but only have happened once to seem to do so in the poet’s eyes.  The sea does not pant with passion, does not hunger after the beauty of the stars; Death has no mountain-tops, or any property which can be compared thereto; and “the dark waves”—in that most beautiful conceit which follows, and which Mr. Smith has borrowed from Mr. Bailey, improving it marvellously nevertheless—do not “pluck at the moon,” but only seem to do so.  And what constitutes the beauty of this very conceit—far the best of those we have chosen—but that it looks so very like an image, so very like a law, from being so very common and customary an ocular deception to one standing on a low shore at night?

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

      1

      This Lecture was given at Harrow in 1873, and in America in 1874.

      2

      Fraser’s Magazine, November, 1853.

      3

      “Poems,” by Alexander Smith.  London: Bogue.  1853.  Fraser’s Magazine, October, 1853.

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 СКАЧАТЬ