Wiley Practitioner's Guide to GAAS 2017. Flood Joanne M.

Чтение книги онлайн.

      v. A combination of the preceding

      3. Preparer and reviewer identification

      a. Identification of person who prepared audit documentation and date of preparation:

      i. If client prepared the audit documentation, this should be noted. Person who checked papers also should be identified.

      b. Identification of person who reviewed the audit documentation and date of review

      4. Explanation of symbols

      a. Symbols used in the audit documentation should be explained. Symbols indicate matters such as the following:

      i. Columns were footed.

      ii. Columns were cross-footed.

      iii. Data were traced to original sources.

      5. Source of information

      a. The audit documentation should indicate source of information:

      i. Client records

      ii. Client personnel

      Related Accounts

      One page of audit documentation may provide documentation for more than one account. Many balance sheet accounts are related to income statement accounts. In these circumstances, the audit work on the accounts should be documented in one page of audit documentation. Examples of related accounts are the following:

      Client Preparation of Audit Documentation

      It is advisable to have the client's employees prepare as much as possible of the auditor's audit documentation. This increases the efficiency of the audit. The auditor should identify the audit documentation as “Prepared by the Client” (PBC) and note the auditor who reviewed the client-prepared audit documentation. The preparation of audit documentation by the client does not impair the auditor's independence. However, the auditor should test the information in client-prepared audit documentation.

      Quality of Audit Documentation

      Audit documentation aids the execution and supervision of the current year's engagement. Also, such documentation helps the auditor in planning and executing the following year's audit. Audit documentation also serves as the auditor's reference for answering questions from the client. For example, a bank or a credit agency may want information that the auditor can provide to the client for submission to the third party from the audit documentation.

      In case of litigation against the client, the auditor's audit documentation may be subpoenaed. In litigation against the auditor, the audit documentation will be used as evidence. Therefore audit documentation should be accurate, complete, and understandable. After audit documentation is reviewed, additional work, if any, is done, and modifications are made to the audit documentation, superseded drafts, corrected documents, duplicate documents, and review notes, and all to-do points should be discarded because the issues they addressed have been appropriately responded to in the audit documentation. (AU-C 230.A6)

      Likewise, miscellaneous notes, memoranda, e-mails, and other communications among members of the audit engagement team created during the audit should be included or summarized in the audit documentation when needed to identify issues or support audit conclusions; otherwise, they should be discarded. Any information added after completion of fieldwork should be dated at the date added.

      Oral Explanations

      Oral explanations on their own do not represent sufficient support for the work the auditor performed or conclusions the auditor reached but may be used by the auditor to clarify or explain information contained in the audit documentation. (AU-C 230.A7)

      Audit Documentation Deficiencies

      Some of the more common audit documentation deficiencies are failure to:

      Documentation Requirements in Other Sections

      Certain other sections require documentation of specific matters. These requirements are presented in Illustration 4 at the end of this chapter. In addition, other standards, such as government auditing standards, laws, or regulations, may also contain specific documentation requirements.

      Interpretations

      Providing Access to or Copies of Audit Documentation to a Regulator (Issued July 1994; Revised June 1996; Revised October 2000; Revised January 2002; Revised December 2005; Revised December 15, 2012)

      A regulator may request access to an auditor's audit documentation to fulfill a quality review requirement or to assist in establishing the scope of a regulatory examination. In making the request, the regulator may ask to make photocopies and may also make such copies available to others. When regulators make a request for access, the auditor should:

      AU-C Illustrations

      Illustrations 1,2 and 3 are adapted from AICPA Interpretations СКАЧАТЬ