Decorative Art. Albert Jacquemart
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Decorative Art - Albert Jacquemart страница 8

Название: Decorative Art

Автор: Albert Jacquemart

Издательство: Parkstone International Publishing

Жанр: Иностранные языки

Серия: Temporis

isbn: 978-1-78042-884-0, 978-1-78310-787-2

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ a species of drawers sliding on inner grooves. This style, as we see, is entirely a style of transition and often exhibits the same arrangement as the Boulle furniture.

      The most remarkable bout de bureau we have ever seen is that belonging to Gustave de Rothschild, which appeared at the Exhibition for the benefit of Alsace and Lorraine. The lower part, rectangular and open on the sides, bore on its front a trophy of musical instruments tied by ribbons, and on the sides masks crowned with palmettes and acanthus leaves in gilt metal. The upper part, narrower at the top with two folding doors ornamented with palmette crowned masks, was united to the base by arched flowerings falling back in a fretwork against their bases. Brackets projected from the recesses to serve as support for the athletes bearing coiled scrolls. The piece is crowned by an allegorical bronze, which is partly gilt and partly tinted with a brown patina; on a mass of clouds traversed by the scythe of time appears a winged globe, half covered by a veil and encircled by a serpent. The hours are marked upon it and a genie points to them, while another genie, surrounded by symbols of the sciences and seated on the clouds, is writing in a book he holds. The clock is signed, “Stollewerck, à Paris”.

      This evidently belongs to the 17th century and it seems impossible to determine more than this with certainty. It is very difficult, as we said before, to circumscribe different pieces of furniture within exact limits and define the period in which each type should begin and end. In the case of ebony with brass, a mixed and undetermined style, a scrupulous observation of the general form and the workmanship of the metal may furnish indications, which must, however, be accepted with caution. The different styles did not succeed each other suddenly and radically as fashions at that time were not as imperious as now. Therefore, industry could produce kinds, which we should feel inclined to extend over a widely graduated scale, at the same time, and traditions were frequently preserved with the succeeding fashions. Thus, in the time of Louis XV, we still find ebony with bronze chasings in perfect taste.

      Pair of armchairs with curved-backs and medallion-adorned frames, 18th century. Gilded wood, silk.

      Furniture overlaid with tortoise shell and metal

      Of all sovereigns, Louis XIV is certainly the monarch who best knew how to surround the royal majesty with the most dazzling splendour. He required sumptuous buildings for his habitation, and if Versailles as a palace realised his dreams, he still required that the furniture destined to fill those galleries with glittering mirrors, gildings, paintings and sculptures, should be worthy of such companionship and should exhibit a magnificence unknown until that day. Logical in his conceptions, the king understood that he must entrust the manufacture of the carpets, furniture and silverware to real artists. In order to gather the most talented, he initially granted apartments in the Louvre to each of those who had distinguished themselves by works of uncommon merit. In 1662, to create a necessary harmony amongst the different works and create a common thought throughout, he centralised the various workshops at the Gobelins, placing them in 1667 under the direction of Le Brun, his first painter. Le Brun was succeeded by Pierre Mignard after his death in 1690.

      Amongst those whose conceptions of furniture were such as Louis XIV and Le Brun desired, we must mention above all André-Charles Boulle. Had he previously tried his skill in styles already known, as he would afterwards try those which were to become the fashion after him? This is probable; however, he did not find the splendour he aimed to attain. Instead, he conceived the idea of constructing furniture in ebony and covering the large surfaces with inlaid tortoise shell, cut out and coated with arabesques, branches of foliage, and ornaments in thin brass and white metal, and sometimes enriched by elaborate chisel engraving. This brilliant mosaic work was also accompanied by ormolu bas-reliefs, masks, scrolls, mouldings, entablatures and encoignures, forming a framework for the whole and distributing luminous points of attraction to prevent the eye from being disorientated by a dangerous glare.

      To give the inlay the desired exactness, the artist imagined the plan of superimposing two plates of equal size and thickness, one of metal, the other of tortoise shell, and after tracing his design, cutting them out with the same stroke of the saw. Thus, he obtained four proofs of the composition, two at the base where the design appeared in hollow spaces, and two ornamental which, when placed in the spaces of the opposite ground piece, inserted themselves exactly without any perceptible joining. The result of this practice was seen in two different and simultaneous pieces of furniture. One, designated as the first part, was the tortoise shell bottom with metal applications; the other, called the second part, was appliqué metal with tortoise shell arabesques. The counterpart, therefore, being still richer than the prototype, the pieces were arranged with crossed effects. Boulle did more and found in his great compositions means to add to the splendour of the effect by simultaneously employing the first and second parts in suitably balanced masses.

      While acknowledging the overall positive effect of the two styles invented by André-Charles Boulle, we must insist on the point that the first part should be more highly valued because it is more complete. Let us take for example one of the beautiful types issued from the hands of the artist, and we will see how smartly the elaborate engraving corrects the coldness of certain outlines. The shells trace their paths of light, the draperies of the canopies fall in cleverly disordered folds, the grotesque masks grimace, the branches of foliage are lightened by the strongly marked veins of the leaves according to the importance of the masses; everything lives and has a language. Observe the counterpart; it is but the reflection of the idea, the faded shadow of the original.

      Chest of François d’Estaing, Bishop of Rodez, 1501–1529. Carved and painted limewood, 43 × 78.2 × 42.6 cm. Diocese of Rodez.

      Boulle furniture was best adapted for the huge saloons and state apartments required in the reign of Louis XIV. Those large inlaid console tables admirably filled the spaces between the windows and were laden with silver and gold vases, gold-rimmed jasper and porphyry, and chased garlands reflected by innumerable mirrors. As for real furniture which would be useful in one’s private life, it was most rare. We encounter tables, desks and even coin boxes in small number; a commode exists in Sir Richard Wallace’s collection, but it is so far from meriting its name, its details are so heavy that we feel the desire to display it revealed beneath this concession made to ordinary furniture. A few caskets, writing desks, the necessary accompaniments of the bureau, armoires, bookcases, and angle cupboards; this was all.

      Boulle, however, created a school; André-Charles, designated in old catalogues as Father Boulle, had four sons, nephews perhaps and in any case many pupils. The style and perfection alone of his works would cause them to be recognised and distinguished from imitations. The greatest choice lies in the innumerable religious clocks, either docked or placed on hanging brackets; they are always topped with figures or ensembles of marvellous execution. Also, the bas-reliefs which appear underneath the dial, are no less remarkable and in complete harmony with the inlaid decorations.

      To acquire the skill of recognising the hand of a learned inventor of this style, it will suffice to attentively examine the pieces which fill the Galerie d’Apollon, and others distributed throughout Parisian museums. Amongst others, a magnificent armoire will be noted; its monochrome marquetry occupies a considerable space. The two upper panels display vases of flowers framed by metal inlays of the finest execution. The shades are so well combined that the brass and tortoise shell do not spoil the effect of the wood marquetry, and the wood does not distract the eye at the expense of the ornamental designs.

      We feel pleasure in attributing this judicious taste to the eminent man from whom Louis XIV acquired his royal furniture. We place to the account of the sons and successors of Boulle the extravagant articles in which the tortoise shell parts are replaced by tinted blue or vermilion horn; this unseasonable polychromy takes away both its severe majesty and its rich and serious harmony from the compositions. Most of these deviations can be attributed to Philippe Poitou, an imitator of the master who became the king’s marquetry worker in 1683. It is rare, as we said СКАЧАТЬ