Название: The Foundations of the Origin of Species
Автор: Darwin Charles
Издательство: Public Domain
Жанр: Зарубежная классика
isbn:
isbn:
169
170
The author’s work on duck’s wings &c. is in
171
The words
172
In the male florets of certain Compositæ the style functions merely as a piston for forcing out the pollen.
173
«On the back of the page is the following.» If abortive organs are a trace preserved by hereditary tendency, of organ in ancestor of use, we can at once see why important in natural classification, also why more plain in young animal because, as in last section, the selection has altered the old animal most. I repeat, these wondrous facts, of parts created for no use in past and present time, all can by my theory receive simple explanation; or they receive none and we must be content with some such empty metaphor, as that of De Candolle, who compares creation to a well covered table, and says abortive organs may be compared to the dishes (some should be empty) placed symmetrically!
174
The author doubtless meant that the complex relationships between organisms can be roughly represented by a net in which the knots stand for species.
175
Between the lines occurs: – “one «?» form be lost.”
176
The original sentence is here broken up by the insertion of: – “out of the dust of Java, Sumatra, these «?» allied to past and present age and «illegible», with the stamp of inutility in some of their organs and conversion in others.”
177
Between the lines occur the words: – “Species vary according to same general laws as varieties; they cross according to same laws.”
178
“A cross with a bull-dog has affected for many generations the courage and obstinacy of greyhounds,”
179
The simile of the savage and the ship occurs in the
180
In the
181
See a similar passage in the
182
See the
183
The following discussion, together with some memoranda are on the last page of the MS. “The supposed creative spirit does not create either number or kind which «are» from analogy adapted to site (viz. New Zealand): it does not keep them all permanently adapted to any country, – it works on spots or areas of creation, – it is not persistent for great periods, – it creates forms of same groups in same regions, with no physical similarity, – it creates, on islands or mountain summits, species allied to the neighbouring ones, and not allied to alpine nature as shown in other mountain summits – even different on different island of similarly constituted archipelago, not created on two points: never mammifers created on small isolated island; nor number of organisms adapted to locality: its power seems influenced or related to the range of other species wholly distinct of the same genus, – it does not equally effect, in amount of difference, all the groups of the same class.”
184
This passage is the ancestor of the concluding words in the first edition of the
185
Compare the
186
The cumulative effect of domestication is insisted on in the
187
This type of variation passes into what he describes as the direct effect of conditions. Since they are due to causes acting during the adult life of the organism they might be called individual variations, but he uses this term for congenital variations,
188
«It is not clear where the following note is meant to come»: Case of Orchis, – most remarkable as not long cultivated by seminal propagation. Case of varieties which soon acquire, like
189
Here, as in the MS. of 1842, the author is inclined to minimise the variation occurring in nature.
190
This is more strongly stated than in the
191
See
192
193
It is interesting to find that though the author, like his contemporaries, believed in the inheritance of acquired characters, he excluded the case of mutilation.
194
This corresponds to
195
196
For
197
198
Selection is here used in the sense of isolation, rather than as implying the summation of small differences. Professor Henslow in his
199
See the Essay of 1842, p. 3.
200
See
201
202
The effects of crossing is much more strongly stated here than in the