Origin of Cultivated Plants. Alphonse de Candolle
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Origin of Cultivated Plants - Alphonse de Candolle страница 17

Название: Origin of Cultivated Plants

Автор: Alphonse de Candolle

Издательство: Public Domain

Жанр: Зарубежная классика

Серия:

isbn:

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ in Spanish, scalogno in Italian, Aschaluch or Eschlauch in German.

      In 1855 I had spoken of the species as follows:242

      “According to Roxburgh,243 Allium ascalonicum is much cultivated in India. The Sanskrit name pulandu is attributed to it, a word nearly identical with palandu, attributed to A. Cepa.244 Evidently the distinction between the two species is not clear in Indian or Anglo-Indian works.

      “Loureiro says he saw Allium ascalonicum cultivated in Cochin-China,245 but he does not mention China, and Thunberg does not indicate this species in Japan. Its cultivation, therefore, is not universal in the east of Asia. This fact, and the doubt about the Sanskrit name, lead me to think that it is not ancient in Southern Asia. Neither, in spite of the name of the species, am I convinced that it existed in Western Asia. Rauwolf, Forskal, and Delile do not mention it in Siberia, in Arabia, or in Egypt. Linnæus246 mentions Hasselquist as having found the species in Palestine. Unfortunately, he gives no details about the locality, nor about its wild condition. In the Travels of Hasselquist247 I find a Cepa montana mentioned as growing on Mount Tabor and on a neighbouring mountain, but there is nothing to prove that it was this species. In his article on the onions and garlics of the Hebrews he mentions only Allium Cepa, then A. porrum and A. sativum. Sibthorp did not find it in Greece,248 and Fraas249 does not mention it as now cultivated in that country. According to Koch,250 it is naturalized among the vines near Fiume. However, Viviani251 only speaks of it as a cultivated plant in Dalmatia.

      “From all these facts I am led to believe that Allium ascalonicum is not a species. It is enough to render its primitive existence doubtful, to remark: (1) that Theophrastus and ancient writers in general have spoken of it as a form of the Allium Cepa, having the same importance as the varieties cultivated in Greece, Thrace, and elsewhere; (2) that its existence in a wild state cannot be proved; (3) that it is little cultivated, or not all, in the countries where it is supposed to have had its origin, as in Syria, Egypt, and Greece; (4) that it is commonly without flowers, whence the name of Cepa sterilis given by Bauhin, and the number of its bulbs is an allied fact; (5) when it does flower, the organs of the flower are similar to those of A. Cepa, or at least no difference has been hitherto discovered, and according to Koch252 the only difference in the whole plant is that the stalk and leaves are less swelled, although fistulous.”

      Such was formerly my opinion.253 The facts published since 1855 do not destroy my doubts, but, on the contrary, justify them. Regel, in 1875, in his monograph of the genus Allium, declares he has only seen the shallot as a cultivated species. Aucher Eloy has distributed a plant from Asia Minor under the name of A. ascalonicum, but judging from my specimen this is certainly not the species. Boissier tells me that he has never seen A. ascalonicum in the East, and it is not in his herbarium. The plant from the Morea which bears this name in the flora of Bory and Chaubard is quite a different species, which he has named A. gomphrenoides. Baker,254 in his review of the Alliums of India, China, and Japan, mentions A. ascalonicum in districts of Bengal and of the Punjab, from specimens of Griffith and Aitchison; but he adds, “They are probably cultivated plants.” He attributes to A. ascalonicum Allium sulvia, Ham., of Nepal, a plant little known, and whose wild character is uncertain. The shallot produces many bulbs, which may be propagated or preserved in the neighbourhood of cultivation, and thus cause mistakes as to its origin.

      Finally, in spite of the progress of botanical investigations in the East and in India, this form of Allium has not been found wild with certainty. It appears to me, therefore, more probable than ever that it is a modification of A. Cepa, dating from about the beginning of the Christian era – a modification less considerable than many of those observed in other cultivated plants, as, for instance, in the cabbage.

      RocamboleAllium scorodoprasum, Linnæus.

      If we cast a glance at the descriptions and names of A. scorodoprasum in works on botany since the time of Linnæus, we shall see that the only point on which authors are agreed is the common name of rocambole. As to the distinctive characters, they sometimes approximate the plant to Allium sativum, sometimes regard it as altogether distinct. With such different definitions, it is difficult to know in what country the plant, well known in its cultivated state as the rocambole, is found wild. According to Cosson and Germain,255 it grows in the environs of Paris. According to Grenier and Godron,256 the same form grows in the east of France. Burnat says he found the species undoubtedly wild in the Alpes-Maritimes, and he gave specimens of it to Boissier. Willkomm and Lange do not consider it to be wild in Spain,257 though one of the French names of the cultivated plant is ail or eschalote d’Espagne. Many other European localities seem to me doubtful, since the specific characters are so uncertain. I mention, however, that, according to Ledebour,258 the plant which he calls A. scorodoprasum is very common in Russia from Finland to the Crimea. Boissier received a specimen of it from Dobrutscha, sent by the botanist Sintenis. The natural habitat of the species borders, therefore, on that of Allium sativum, or else an attentive study of all these forms will show that a single species, comprising several varieties, extends over a great part of Europe and the bordering countries of Asia.

      The cultivation of this species of onion does not appear to be of ancient date. It is not mentioned by Greek and Roman authors, nor in the list of plants recommended by Charlemagne to the intendants of his gardens.259 Neither does Olivier de Serres speak of it. We can only give a small number of original common names among ancient peoples. The most distinctive are in the North. Skovlög in Denmark, keipe and rackenboll in Sweden.260 Rockenbolle, whence comes the French name, is German. It has not the meaning given by Littré. Its etymology is Bolle, onion, growing among the rocks, Rocken.261

      ChivesAllium schœnoprasum, Linnæus.

      This species occupies an extensive area in the northern hemisphere. It is found all over Europe, from Corsica and Greece to the south of Sweden, in Siberia as far as Kamtschatka, and also in North America, but only near the Lakes Huron and Superior and further north262– a remarkable circumstance, considering its European habitat. The variety found in the Alps is the nearest to the cultivated form.263

      The ancient Greeks and Romans must certainly have known the species, since it is wild in Italy and Greece. Targioni believes it to be the Scorodon schiston of Theophrastus; but we are dealing with words without descriptions, and authors whose specialty is the interpretation of Greek text like Fraas and Lenz, are prudent enough to affirm nothing. If the ancient names are doubtful, the fact of the cultivation of the plant at this epoch is yet more so. It is possible that the custom of gathering it in the fields existed.

       ColocasiaArum esculentum, Linnæus; Colocasia antiquorum, Schott.СКАЧАТЬ



<p>242</p>

Géog. Bot. Raisonnée, p. 829.

<p>243</p>

Roxburgh, Fl. Ind.; edit. 1832, vol. ii. p. 142.

<p>244</p>

Piddington, Index.

<p>245</p>

Loureiro, Fl. Cochin., p. 251.

<p>246</p>

Linnæus, Species, p. 429.

<p>247</p>

Hasselquist, Voy. and Trav., 1766, pp. 281, 282.

<p>248</p>

Sibthorp, Prodr.

<p>249</p>

Fraas, Syn. Fl. Class., p. 291.

<p>250</p>

Koch, Syn. Fl. Germ., 2nd edit., p. 833.

<p>251</p>

Viviani, Fl. Dalmat., p. 138.

<p>252</p>

Koch, Syn. Fl. Germ.

<p>253</p>

A. de Candolle, Géogr. Bot. Raisonnée, p. 829.

<p>254</p>

Baker, in Journ. of Bot., 1874, p. 295.

<p>255</p>

Cosson and Germain, Flore, ii. p. 553.

<p>256</p>

Grenier and Godron, Flore de France, iii. p. 197.

<p>257</p>

Willkomm and Lange, Prodr. Fl. Hisp., i. p. 885.

<p>258</p>

Ledebour, Flora Rossica, iv. p. 163.

<p>259</p>

Le Grand d’Aussy, Histoire de la Vie des Français, vol. i. p. 122.

<p>260</p>

Nemnich, Polyglott. Lexicon, p. 187.

<p>261</p>

Ibid.

<p>262</p>

Asa Gray, Botany of the Northern States, edit. 5, p. 534.

<p>263</p>

De Candolle, Flore Française, iv. p. 227.