Russian Painting. Peter Leek
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Russian Painting - Peter Leek страница 6

Название: Russian Painting

Автор: Peter Leek

Издательство: Parkstone International Publishing

Жанр: Иностранные языки

Серия: Temporis

isbn: 978-1-78310-750-6, 978-1-78042-975-5

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ of Vishnyakov, concentrating primarily on learning to paint formal portraits. Flags, columns and other decorative accessories tended to be featured in these portraits, along with luxuriant robes and drapery, all painted in lively colours. In deference to convention, they were normally full-length. Despite the inhibiting nature of official portraiture, Antropov managed to achieve a remarkable degree of veracity. The portraits, both formal and informal, that he painted during the 1750s and 1760s show him at his best.

      Antropov’s contemporary Ivan Argunov painted numerous portraits of artists and their families. By the middle of the eighteenth century he was already considered a leading portrait painter, and he received a great variety of commissions – probably greater than any other Russian artist of his time. His portraits range from the Empress and members of the court to the serfs and ancestors of his wealthy patron, Count Sheremetyev. While Antropov’s style – with its rather static quality and detached feeling – is sometimes reminiscent of the parsunas, Argunov’s work is generally more immediate and less austere.

      In addition to Argunov, among the portrait painters of the second half of the eighteenth century, three stand out for the brilliance of their work: Rokotov, Levitsky and Borovikovsky. Their styles, however, are very different. Surprisingly, although highly regarded by his contemporaries, Fyodor Rokotov was completely forgotten during the period following his death and was only rediscovered at the beginning of the twentieth century. Initially he worked as a court painter in Saint Petersburg, where he produced portraits remarkable for their individuality and vivacity, among them his Portrait of the young Alexeï Bobrinsky. In 1767 Rokotov moved to Moscow, where he became the portraitist most sought after by Muscovite society. Once he was freed from the constraints of court painting, his portraits – especially those intended for the interiors of private houses – became more intimate. Particularly in his later works, he increasingly made use of sfumazo (almost imperceptible colour transitions), and a silvery tonal range to reproduce the delicate sheen of his sitters’ satins, silks and velvets.

      28. Vassily Tropinin, Portrait of the Writer Varvara Lizogub, 1847. Oil on canvas, 82.5 × 68 cm, Russian Museum, St. Petersburg.

      29. Karl Briullov, Rider, Portrait of Giovannina and Amazillia Paccini, 1832. Oil on canvas, 291.5 × 206 cm, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      30. Alexeï Venetsianov, Reaper, before 1827. Oil on canvas, 82.5 × 68 cm, Russian Museum, St. Petersburg.

      31. Karl Briullov, Portrait of the Artist with Baroness Yekaterina Meller-Zakomelskaya and her Daughter in a Boat, 1833–35. Oil on canvas, 151.5 × 190.3 cm, Russian Museum, St. Petersburg.

      32. Karl Briullov, Italian Midday, 1827. Oil on canvas, 64 × 55 cm, Russian Museum, St. Petersburg.

      33. Vassily Perov, Portrait of the Merchant Ivan Kamynin, 1872. Oil on canvas, 104 × 84.3 cm, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      34. Vassily Perov, Portrait of the Writer Alexander Ostrovsky, 1871. Oil on canvas, 103.5 × 80.7 cm, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      Dmitri Levitsky differed from Rokotov in that he possessed a marvellous ability to interpret and express personality. Every detail is painted with care, yet a feeling of spontaneity is never absent from his work. The son of a priest who was a gifted engraver, Levitsky was born in the Ukraine. After studying with Antropov, he spent a few years producing icons for churches in Moscow, then taught portrait painting at the Academy from 1771 to 1788. Levitsky excelled at female portraiture, as can be seen from his paintings of the aristocratic Ursula Mniszech and Maria Diakova, the wife of architect, painter and poet Nikolaï Lvov. Between 1773 and 1776, at the request of Catherine the Great, he painted a series of portraits of her favourite pupils at Smolny Institute (the school she founded for the education of young noblewomen), showing them engaged in such activities as amateur dramatics, playing the harp or dancing the minuet. Thanks to his portraits of foreign visitors to Saint Petersburg – among them Diderot – Levitsky acquired a reputation outside Russia (his style was even compared with that of Boucher and Watteau). In 1788 illness forced him to retire from the Academy, where he had been the principal teacher of portraiture. During the last thirty years of his life he hardly painted at all.

      A member of an old Cossack family, Vladimir Borovikovsky (1757–1825) was the son of an icon painter. He lived in Mirgorod until 1788, where he painted icons and portraits in the Ukrainian tradition. In 1790, after Catherine the Great expressed her delight at the allegorical decorations which he had been commissioned to paint in honour of her triumphal tour of the Crimea, Borovikovsky moved to Saint Petersburg, where he studied with Levitsky and the Austrian portrait painter Johann-Baptist Lampi. That same year he painted a portrait of Catherine the Great, looking more grandmotherly than regal, walking her favourite dog in the park at Tsarskoe Selo. Borovikovsky’s portraits of women – often attired in Grecian gowns and backed by a sylvan setting – have been likened to those by Gainsborough and Angelica Kauffmann. In many of them, the sitter is portrayed with the fingers of one hand delicately curled round an apple. As late as the 1790s, Borovikovsky’s work was tinged with sentimentalism. Then at the beginning of the nineteenth century he adopted a more classical style, producing works like the Portrait of Prince Alexander Kurakin that he completed in 1802.

      This classical style adopted by Borovikovsky at the start of the nineteenth century led to Romanticism which was beginning to influence Russian portraiture. Painters began to express themselves more freely, and self-portraits became increasingly common. With its accent on individuality, Romanticism was a perfect match for the self-portrait – which was, after all, a vehicle for psychological probing and spiritual revelation. It also led to important changes of form. In order to focus attention on the face, the sitter’s clothes were given less prominence. For the same reason, a neutral background tended to be used.

      35. Vladimir Borovikovsky, Portrait of Prince Alexander Kourakine, 1801–1802. Oil on canvas, 259 × 175 cm, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      36. Orest Kiprensky, Portait of Life Guard Colonel Yevgraf Davydov, 1809. Oil on canvas, 162 × 116 cm, Russian Museum, St. Petersburg.

      37. Orest Kiprensky, Portrait of Alexander Pushkin, 1827. Oil on canvas, 63 × 54 cm, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      38. Vassily Perov, Portrait of Fyodor Dostoyevsky, 1872. Oil on canvas, 99 × 80.5 cm, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      39. Ivan Kramskoï, Self-portrait, 1867. Oil on canvas, Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow.

      Romantic portraiture found its fullest expression in the art of Orest Kiprensky, who painted several self-portraits, including a very painterly one, with brushes stuck behind his ear. Kiprensky’s own life bore the hallmarks of Romanticism. The illegitimate son of an aristocratic army officer, he studied painting at the Academy (where he was enrolled at the age of six) and rapidly became a successful portrait painter. Then in 1805, he was awarded a travelling scholarship, and as soon as the Napoleonic Wars ended he departed for Rome. There he led a fairly bohemian life, and found himself the subject of scandal when an Italian model and a manservant died as a result of a fire at his house. In 1828, after four years back home in Russia, he returned to Italy, married the model’s daughter (whom he had entrusted to a convent school) and spent the next eight СКАЧАТЬ