Counseling the Culturally Diverse. Laura Smith L.
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Counseling the Culturally Diverse - Laura Smith L. страница 37

СКАЧАТЬ It has been pointed out that the United States’ future orientation may be linked to other values as well: (a) our emphasis on youth and achievement, in which children are expected to “better their parents”; (b) controlling one's own destiny by future planning and saving for a rainy day; and (c) optimism and hope for a better future. The spirit of the nation may be embodied in an old General Electric slogan, “Progress is our most important product.”

      Table 3.2 suggests that both American Indians and Black Americans tend to value a more present‐time orientation, whereas Asian Americans and Hispanic Americans have a combination past–present focus. Historically, Asian societies have valued the past, as reflected in ancestor worship and the equating of age with wisdom and respectability. This contrasts with U.S. culture, in which youth is valued over age and one's usefulness in life is believed to be over once one hits the retirement years. As compared to European American middle‐class norms, Latinx Americans also exhibit a past–present time orientation. Strong hierarchical structures in the family and respect for elders and ancestors combine in this direction. American Indians also differ from their White counterparts in that they are traditionally very grounded in the here and now rather than the future. American Indian philosophy incorporates the belief that time is flowing, circular, and harmonious. Artificial divisions of time (as represented in rigid schedules) are disruptive to this natural pattern. African Americans may also prioritize the present, both as the result of the spiritual quality of their existence and their history of survival and resilience in the face of racism. Across all these cultures, difficulties may occur when the counselor or therapist is unaware of potential differences of time perspective (Hines & Boyd‐Franklin, 2005).

      First, if time differences exist between a family of color and the conventionally trained therapist, it may be manifested in a different sense of the pace of time: both may sense things are going too slowly or too fast. An American Indian family that values being in the present and the immediate experiential reality of being may feel that the therapist lacks respect for them and is rushing them (Sutton & Broken Nose, 2005) while ignoring the quality of the personal relationship. On the other hand, therapists may be dismayed by the “delays,” “inefficiency,” and lack of “commitment to change” among the family members, feeling that they have only limited time to impact the family. The result is frequently dissatisfaction among the parties, a failure to establish rapport, misinterpretation of behaviors or situations, and discontinuation of future sessions.

       Mrs. Rivera, your next appointment is at 9:30 a.m. next Wednesday.”

       “Good, it's convenient for me to come after I drop off the children at school.”

      Or “Mrs. Rivera, your next appointment is for the whole family at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday.

       “Very good. After the kids return from school we can come right in.” (Inclan, 1985, p. 328)

      Since school starts at 8 a.m., the client may show up very early, whereas in the second example, the client may be late (school ends at 3 p.m.). In both cases, the counselor is likely to feel inconvenienced, but worse yet is the negative interpretation that may be made of the client's motives (anxious, demanding, or pushy in the first case, and resistant, passive‐aggressive, or irresponsible in the latter). The counselor needs to be aware that other cultural communities may mark time more by events than by the clock.

      RELATIONAL DIMENSION

      In general, the United States can be characterized as an achievement‐oriented society, which is strongly manifested in the prevailing Protestant work ethic. Basic to the Protestant work ethic is the concept of individualism: (a) the individual is the psychosocial unit of operation; (b) the individual has primary responsibility for his or her own actions; (c) independence and autonomy are highly valued and rewarded; and (d) one should be internally directed and controlled. In many societies and groups within the United States, however, this value is not necessarily shared. Identification with others in Japan and China extends widely throughout the family and is also linked to the past (as in ancestor worship). Obeying the wishes of ancestors or deceased parents and perceiving one's existence and identity as connected to the historical past are inseparable parts of one's own identity. In fact, most racial/ethnic groups in the United States tend to be more collateral or collectivistic than do White European Americans in their relationships with people. In an individualistic orientation, the definition of the family tends to be linked to well‐defined biological first‐degree relatedness (as in the nuclear family), whereas a collateral or lineal view prioritized various concepts of the extended family. Not understanding this distinction and the values inherent in these orientations may lead a family therapist to erroneous conclusions and decisions.

      Counselors may fail to realize that, for example, an American Indian family network may be structurally open and understood to include several households of relatives and friends along both vertical and horizontal lines, all of whom are considered as brothers and sisters. Likewise, African Americans have strong kinship bonds that may encompass both blood relatives and friends. Traditional African culture values the collective orientation over individualism (Franklin, 1988; Hines & Boyd‐Franklin, 2005). This group identity has also been reinforced by what many African Americans describe as the sense of “peoplehood” that developed as a result of the common experience of racism and discrimination. In a society that has historically been destructive of the Black family, near and distant relatives, neighbors, friends, and acquaintances have arisen in an extended family support network (Black, 1996). Thus, in their therapist's view, a Black family may appear to be configured differently from the conventional nuclear family. The corresponding danger is that corresponding value judgments made by a White therapist may be totally without merit and/or may be translated in such a way as to alienate or damage the self‐esteem of African Americans. For example, the absence of a father in a Black family does not mean that the children do not have a father figure—this function may be filled by another relative or family friend.

      ACTIVITY DIMENSION