Название: Space Physics and Aeronomy, Ionosphere Dynamics and Applications
Автор: Группа авторов
Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited
Жанр: Физика
isbn: 9781119815532
isbn:
Figure 2.7 (a) A cut through the magnetosphere in the X = 0 plane, showing the sense of plasma flow (black arrows into and out of the page) in the open, closed, and plasmasphere regions, along with the sense of current flows (green) at the magnetopause, ionosphere (polar cap and return flow regions), R1 and R2 FACs, and partial ring current. (b) The deformation of open (blue) and closed (red) field lines by flows in the solar wind and inner magnetosphere and the frictional forces of the ionosphere, and the sense of field‐aligned current produced by the magnetic shear.
Figure 2.8 (Left) Field‐aligned current pattern associated with vorticity in the convection flow, with black as downward current and grey as upward current. The two concentric rings of FAC are region 1 or R1 (high latitude) and region 2 or R2 (low latitude). The overlap of currents in the premidnight sector is associated with the Harang discontinuity. Upward or downward FAC flows poleward of the dayside R1 FAC depending on the sign of IMF BY, associated with east‐west flow asymmetries produced by magnetic tension forces on newly opened field lines
(from Iijima & Potemra, 1976).
(Right) The Harang discontinuity as seen in FACs and convection
(adapted from Iijima & Potemra, 1976; Koskinen & Pulkkinen, 1995).
The magnitude of the FACs can be found from the divergence of J⊥ by combining equations (2.6) and (2.10):
in which the three terms on the RHS are the divergence of JP due to shears in the convection flow, the divergence of JP due to gradients in the Pedersen conductance, and the divergence of JH due to gradients in Hall conductance. In the limit of uniform conductance, this reduces to Poisson's equation. The distribution of FACs can then be compared with or inferred from the vorticity in the convective flow (e.g., Sofko et al., 1995; McWilliams et al., 1997; Green et al., 2006; Chisham et al., 2009). In the auroral zone, with a Pedersen conductance of 10 S, a flow speed of 500 m s−1 produces an ionospheric current across the flow of 0.25 A m−1. If the convection reversal associated with the low‐latitude duskside flow shear is 2,000 km in length, then 0.5 MA of FAC flows in the R2 current there. The R1 current poleward of this will be of a similar magnitude, possibly enhanced somewhat by a contribution from Pedersen current flowing across the polar cap, as shown in Figure 2.3b (though see Laundal et al., 2018, for a discussion of horizontal current closure). By this estimate, it is expected that when convection is ongoing, approximately 2 MA flows into and out of the ionosphere in each hemisphere in the whole R1/R2 system, increasing during periods of strong driving, in agreement with the observations of Iijima and Potemra (1978).
Upward FACs are carried by downgoing electrons from the magnetosphere, which produce auroral emissions and enhanced conductance as they impact on the atmosphere. The requirement of current continuity can lead to field‐parallel acceleration of the electrons to defeat the mirror force that otherwise traps the magnetospheric plasma above the ionosphere, resulting in the production of discrete auroral forms. Indeed, we can draw a link between the convection pattern, the R1/R2 FAC pattern, and the large‐scale distribution of auroras, which is a powerful tool for studying magnetospheric dynamics (section 2.4.2). Not all auroras are formed in this way, however. For instance, auroras can be produced by direct precipitation from the magnetosheath during magnetopause reconnection and from the plasma sheet during tail reconnection, whereas diffuse auroral emissions are produced by СКАЧАТЬ