Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns. Thomas N. Bulkowski
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns - Thomas N. Bulkowski страница 84

Название: Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns

Автор: Thomas N. Bulkowski

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Ценные бумаги, инвестиции

Серия:

isbn: 9781119739692

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ read downward breakouts in a similar manner. Almost a quarter of the patterns (23%) saw price drop no more than 5%. Half (59%) didn't see price drop more than 15%.

      Table 10.4 shows breakout‐related statistics.

      Yearly position, performance. I sorted the breakout price into one of three buckets, each a third of the yearly high–low range. Then I checked performance for patterns in those three buckets. The table shows that there's not a big performance difference for upward breakouts. Clearly, though, you'll want to avoid trading patterns within a third of the yearly high (price rises 41%).

      Downward breakouts also show those near the yearly high underperforming those in the other two buckets. It suggests people should avoid momentum trading this chart pattern and focus on bottom fishing for candidates.

      Throwbacks and pullbacks. Throwbacks and pullbacks occur almost two‐thirds of the time, and it takes stocks less than 2 weeks to return to the breakout price.

      I didn't see any significant performance difference for patterns with and without throwbacks or pullbacks. With other chart patterns, if a throwback or pullback occurs, performance suffers (on average).

      Price resumes the upward move 71% of the time (which is quite good) and the downtrend 55% of the time (which needs improvement, but it's not bad).

      Gaps. Most of the time (for other chart patterns), breakout day gaps help performance but we see that behavior in this pattern only after a downward breakout.

      The rumors you've heard are true: Table 10.5 shows size‐related statistics.

Description Up Breakout Down Breakout
Tall pattern performance 46% –18%
Short pattern performance 39% –13%
Median height as a percentage of breakout price 9.7% 10.4%
Narrow pattern performance 41% –15%
Wide pattern performance 45% –16%
Median width 50 days 42 days
Short and narrow performance 40% –13%
Short and wide performance 37% –10%
Tall and wide performance 48% –18%
Tall and narrow performance 43% –18%

      Width. Wide patterns outperform narrow ones but not by an amount worth telling Mom about. I used the median length to separate narrow patterns from wide ones.

      Height and width combinations. The worst performance comes from patterns that are both short and wide. You will want to avoid those. The best performance happens for patterns both tall and wide. The performance differences are large enough that you should pay attention to them when contemplating a trade.

      Table 10.6 shows volume‐related statistics.

      Volume trend. Volume trends upward most often, but the direction is near random.

      Rising/Falling volume. Broadening patterns with rising volume trend show better performance after the breakout than when volume recedes (as measured from the start to the end of the pattern).

      Breakout volume. Technical analysts seem to place a lot of emphasis on heavy breakout volume, but as the table shows, the results I found are not statistically significant (for heavy or light breakout volume versus performance).

      Table 10.7 shows how often price reaches a stop location. I split the pattern in half (I sedated it ahead of time) and checked how often price returned to the various parts on the journey from the breakout to the ultimate high or low.

Description Up Breakout Down Breakout
Volume trend 58% up 53% up
Rising volume trend performance 45% –16%
Falling volume trend performance 39% –14%
Heavy breakout volume performance 43% –15%
Light breakout volume performance 42% –16%
Description Up Breakout Down Breakout
Pattern top 78% 2%
Middle 26% 17%
Pattern bottom 5% 74%