Patty's Industrial Hygiene, Hazard Recognition. Группа авторов
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Patty's Industrial Hygiene, Hazard Recognition - Группа авторов страница 51

Название: Patty's Industrial Hygiene, Hazard Recognition

Автор: Группа авторов

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Химия

Серия:

isbn: 9781119816188

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ EORM programs to maximize EHS resources and capabilities. This strategy provides a comprehensive risk communication language and a process that is invaluable for receiving worker buy‐in and achieving program implementation in the short term. It can also help in attaining the elusive long term goal of EHS staff everywhere; the retention of program expectations amongst workplace peers for many years to come (11).

      Thanks go to the Exposure and Control Banding Committee of the American Industrial Hygiene Association, and Control Bandits everywhere, for continually stretching the boundaries of how Control Banding applications can be maximized professionally. Appreciation is also given to the dedicated volunteers of Workplace Health Without Borders (WHWB), both international and WHWB‐UK, that have encouraged and championed the power of Control Banding to provide risk communication around the world. This work, in part, was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE‐AC52‐07NA27344, LLNL‐BOOK‐795518.

       Control Banding Resources, https://controlbanding.llnl.gov

       COSHH Essential Technical Basis http://www.coshh-essentials.org.uk/assets/live/CETB.pdf

       ILO Chemical Control Toolkit, https://www.ilo.org/legacy/english/protection/safework/ctrl_banding/toolkit/main_guide.pdf

       GHS Purple Book (Revision 5), https://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev05/05files_e.html

       GHS Purple Book (Revision 7), https://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev07/07files_e.html

       Summary of Hazard Bands based on combining ILO Chemical Control Toolkit and COSHH Essentials e‐Tools, https://www.chemscape.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/Hazard_Band_Handout_2018.pdf

       Summary of relationship between GHS Classification and Hazard Statements based on GHS Purple Book Revision 5, https://www.chemscape.com/themes/chemscape/pdf/ghs-classification-hp-statements_v2.pdf

      1 1 Hayakawa, H., Fischbeck, P.S., and Fischhoff, B. (2000). Traffic accident statistics and risk perceptions in Japan and the United States. Accid Anal Prev 32 (6): 827–835.

      2 2 Sheppard, B., Janoske, M., and Liu, B. (2012). Understanding Risk Communication Theory: A Guide for Emergency Managers and Communicators. Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. START: College Park, MD. http://www.start.umd.edu/sites/default/files/files/publications/UnderstandingRiskCommunicationTheory.pdf (accessed 28 May 2019).

      3 3 Coombs, W.T. (2012). Ongoing Crisis Communication: Planning, Managing, and Responding, 3e. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

      4 4 McComas, K.A. (2006). Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996‐2005. J Health Commun 11 (1): 75–91.

      5 5 Palenchar, M.J. (2005). Risk communication. In: Encyclopedia of Public Relations (ed. R.L. Heath), 752–755. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

      6 6 CERC (2018). Manual for emergency risk communication. Crisis and emergency risk communication. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/ppt/CERC_Introduction.pdf (accessed 28 May 2019).

      7 7 Williams, R.A., Kulinowski, K.M., White, R., and Louis, G. (2010). Risk characterization for nanotechnology. Risk Anal 30 (11): 1671–1679.

      8 8 Mardikian, J. (2008). Mental health consequences of September 11: a five‐year review of the behavioral sciences literature. Behav Soc Sci Libr 27 (3): 158–210.

      9 9 Sandman, P.M. (2003). Four kinds of risk communication. The Synergist, American Industrial Hygiene Association, April: 26–27.

      10 10 Swuste, P. (2007). Qualitative methods for occupational risk prevention strategies in safety, or control banding–safety. Saf Sci Monit 11: 1–7.

      11 11 Hale, A., Ale, B., Goossens, L. et al. (2007). Modeling accidents for prioritizing prevention. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 (12): 1701–1715.

      12 12 Guldenmund, F., Hale, A., and Betten, J. (2006). The development of an audit technique to assess the quality of safety barriers management. J Hazard Mater 130: 234–241.

      13 13 Zalk, D.M. (2010). Control Banding; A Simplified, Qualitative Strategy for the Assessment of Risks and Selection of Solutions, 210. Delft, The Netherlands: TU Delft Publisher.

      14 14 Zalk, D.M. (2001). Grassroots ergonomics: initiating an ergonomics program utilising participatory techniques. Ann Occup Hyg 45 (4): 283–289.

      15 15 Zalk, D.M. (2003). Control banding principles to reduce musculoskeletal disorders: the ergonomics toolkit. Proceedings of the International Ergonomics Association XVth Triennial Congress, IEA, South Korea (24–29 August 2003), Vol. 5, p. 327.

      16 16 Zalk, D.M. and Nelson, D.I. (2008). History and evolution of control banding: a review. J Occup Environ Hyg 5 (4): 330–346.

      17 17 Zalk, D.M. and Heussen, H. (2011). Banding the world together; the global growth of control banding and qualitative occupational risk management. Saf Health Work 2 (4): 375–379.

      18 18 Oldershaw, P.J. (2003). Control banding workshop, 4–5 November 2002, London. Ann Occup Hyg 47 (7): 531–532.

      19 19 Zalk, D.M., Paik, S., and Swuste, P. (2009). Evaluating the control banding nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures. J Nanopart Res 11 (7): 1685–1704.

      20 20 Brouwer, D.H. (2012). Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg 56 (5): 506–514.

      21 21 Zalk, D.M. and Paik, S.Y. (2016). Qualitative risk assessment and control banding. In: Handbook of Occupational Exposure to Nanomaterials, 2e, Chapter 6 (ed. G. Ramachandran). London, UK: Elsevier.

      22 22 Deveau, M., Chen, C.P., Johanson, G. et al. (2015). The global landscape of occupational exposure limits – implementation of principles to guide limit selection. J Occup Environ Hyg 12 (Supp 11): S127–S144.

      23 23 Nelson, D.I., Chiusano, S.V., Bracker, A.L. et al. (2007). AIHA Guidelines 9‐2007. Guidance for Conducting Control Banding Analyses. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association.

      24 24 Fingerhut, M. (2008). Editorial: global quantitative risk management (control banding) activities. СКАЧАТЬ