Misunderstanding, Nationalism, or Legalism. Richard Wellons Winston

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Moo, Epistle to the Romans, 619–20. Grieb observes that Paul also uses an inclusio to mark off the previous section: the reference to “seed” (σπέρμα) in 9:7, 29 (Romans, 97). Commentators rightly recognize that Paul continues to discuss themes raised in 9:30—10:13 in 10:14–21 (e.g., Longenecker and Moo treat Rom 9:30–10:21 as one section [Romans, 827, and Epistle to the Romans, 616, respectively]). Longenecker even notes that the quotation of Isa 65:1–2 in 10:20–21 functions to close the subsection 9:30–10:21 just as the citation of Isa 10:22–23 and 1:9 earlier in 9:27–29 functioned to close the subsection 9:6–29 (Romans, 834). However, the πῶς οὖν which begins 10:14 shifts the focus from the necessity of calling upon Christ for salvation (9:30—10:13, particularly 10:9–13) to the means of doing so (10:14–17). Furthermore, 9:30—10:13 is held together by several occurences of γὰρ and ὅτι, whereas 10:14 features οὖν, just as 9:30 (the beginning of the new subsection) does.

      21. Dunn, Romans, 2:577; Moo, Epistle to the Romans, 618; Toews, Romans, 258.

      22. Dunn, Romans, 2:577; Moo, Epistle to the Romans, 619; Toews, Romans, 258. Several interpreters argue that the OT citations in 10:5–8 are complementary rather than contrastive, but do not dispute the overall contrast throughout the passage.

      23. Badenas, End of the Law, 101; Barth, Dogmatics, 242; Barrett, Romans, 192; Cranfield, Romans, 2:505; Dunn, Romans, 2:579; Käsemann, Romans, 276; Longenecker, Romans, 831; Stuhlmacher, Romans, 152; Toews, “Law,” 106. Other commentators such as Dodd, Fitzmyer, and Wilckens view 9:30–33 as transitional to the main argument in 10:1–13 (Romans, 160; Romans, 576; and Römer, 2:211, respectively). However, two factors warrant against this. First, since 9:30–33 contains the same contrast one finds in 10:1–13, one would expect the latter paragraphs to develop what is stated in the first. Second, the occurrence of μὲν without other particles indicates that μὲν functions in 10:1 as a marker of continuation (BDAG, 630). Paul begins his argument in 9:30–33 and continues it in 10:1–13. The content of 9:30–33 is foundational and essential, not just transitional.

      24. As argued by Barth, People of God, 39–40; Gaston, Paul and the Torah, 99, 142; Wright, Paul, 1166; Wright, Romans, 646–47. For the argument that the theme of gentile inclusion receives equal emphasis with the explanation of Israel’s failure, see Kaylor, Paul’s Covenant Community, 166; Mohrmann, “Semantic Collisions,” 268; Toews, Romans, 257; Watson, Beyond the New Perspective, 322–33.

      25. Aquinas, Romans, 277–78; Black, Romans, 136; Byrne, Romans, 307; Calvin, Romans, 376; Dumbrell, Romans, 102; Dunn, Romans, 2:576–77; Fitzmyer, Romans, 576; Hultgren, Romans, 376–77; Johnson, Romans, 166–68; Käsemann, Romans, 276; Keck, Romans, 242; Kruse, Romans, 392–93; Moo, Epistle to the Romans, 617–18; Mounce, Romans, 205; Nygren, Romans, 376–77; Osborne, Romans, 259–61; Sanday and Headlam, Romans, 301; Schreiner, Romans, 531; Seifrid, “Romans,” 650; Stowers, Romans, 302–3; Stuhlmacher, Romans, 151; Thielman, Theology, 368–69; Witherington, Romans, 249–51.

      26. While we are confining our inquiry to Rom 9:30–10:21, Longenecker notes that Paul uses more OT quotations, biblical allusions, and proverbial materials based on OT Scripture in Rom 9:30—10:21 than he does in 9:6–29 (Romans, 830).

      27. Moo, Epistle to the Romans, 618. Pattee observes, “looking at the wider parameters of Romans 9 and 10, the influence of the OT is clearly discernable at almost every juncture” (“Stumbling Stone,” 155).

      28. Toews, “Law,” 101.

      29. Meyer, End, 210.

      30. Dumbrell, “Paul,” 286.

      31. Hübner, Law; Hultgren, “Paul,” 205–6; Moyise, Paul, 60; Räisänen, Paul, 1:29.

      32. Mohrmann, “Semantic Collisions”; Pattee, “Stumbling Stone”; Toews, “Law.”

      33. This literature review focuses on articles, essays and monographs. We interact with the commentary literature in the exegesis.

      34. Bring, “Paul,” 21–60.

      35. Bring, “Paul,” 22.

      36. Bring, “Paul,” 25.

      37. Bring, “Paul,” 26.

      38. Bring, “Paul,” 26–27.

      39. Bring, “Paul,” 27.

      40. Bring, “Paul,” 44.

      41. Bring, “Paul,” 44.

      42. Bring, “Paul,” 48.

      43. Cranfield, “Some Notes,” 35–43.

      44. Cranfield, “St. Paul,” 43–68. Now Cranfield, “St. Paul and the Law,” 148–72.

      45. A failure Cranfield identifies as “a reprehensible omission” (“Some Notes,” 40n10).

      46. Cranfield, “Some Notes,” 37.

      47. Cranfield, “Some Notes,” 38.

      48. Cranfield, “Some Notes,” 39.

      49. Cranfield, “Some Notes,” 40.

      50. Barrett, “Romans 9.30–10.21,” 99–121. Now Barrett, “Fall and Responsibility СКАЧАТЬ