Turning to the Other. Donovan D. Johnson

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Stein, “On Modern Initiation,” 96–99.

      61. Stein, “On Modern Initiation,” 99.

      62. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 59–60.

      63. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 58.

      64. Schaeder, Hebrew Humanism, 238.

      65. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 58.

      66. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 58 (translation modified).

      67. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 58 (translation modified).

      68. Buber (my translation), quoting from Ba’al Shem Tov, Tzva’at HaRivash 1:20.

      69. Buber, “Baal-Shem-Tov’s Instruction,” 185.

      70. Buber, “Baal-Shem-Tov’s Instruction,” 214n1 (translation modified).

      71. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 59 (my translation). Bracketed words present Dan Avnon’s helpful amplifications of this passage (Avnon, Martin Buber, 82–83, 237n4).

      72. Buber later asserted the centrality of “religiosity” (Religiosität) in his 1913 lecture, “Jewish Religiosity,” 79–94.

      73. Avnon comments: “The perfect man” is the one “whose life is oriented to the task of translating ‘the Adam as created in the image of Elohim’ into actual, realized human life” (Martin Buber, 83).

      74. Buber, “My Way to Hasidism,” 58–60.

      75. Buber, “Commentary,” 72–73, 76–77. See chapter 6 below [x-ref].

      76. Buber, I and Thou, §36c.

      77. Buber, I and Thou, §60.

      78. Friedman, Martin Buber’s Life and Work, 1:97.

      79. Buber, I and Thou, §46e, §60a, §61h.

      80. Buber, “Foundation Stone,” 70–71.

      81. Buber, “Foundation Stone,” 71.

      82. Buber, “Foundation Stone,” 71.

      83. Buber, “Baal-Shem-Tov’s Instruction,” 181 (my translation).

      84. Buber, “Dialogue,” 14–15.

      85. Buber, “Dialogue,” 15.

      86. Buber, “Dialogue,” 15.

      87. Buber, “Dialogue,” 15.

      88. Buber, “Spinoza,” 94; see Buber’s other references to human life as divine-human dialogue: “Dialogue between Heaven and Earth,” 221; “Replies to My Critics,” 710; “Prejudices of Youth,” 51.

      89. Buber, “Foundation Stone,” 70.

      90. Buber, “Hasidism and Modern Man,” 24.

      91. Buber, “Postscript,” 123.

      92. Buber, “Replies to My Critics,” 703.

      93. Buber, “Replies to My Critics,” 702.

      94. Buber, “Replies to My Critics,” 689–90, 691 (emphasis his); compare this first-person account with Buber’s more general statement on the impact of the unconditional in “Herut,” 153: “The unconditional affects a person when he lets his whole being be gripped by it, be utterly shaken and transformed by it, and when he responds to it with his whole being . . .”

      95. Buber and Rogers, “Dialogue between Martin Buber and Carl R. Rogers,” 168; see also, Buber, “Elements of the Interhuman,” 81.

      96. Friedman, Martin Buber’s Life and Work, 1:245. It is important to note that Friedman’s claim and my thesis are exactly the same here. Yet Friedman does not develop the connections and implications of this trauma. These connections and implications are the core of my argument here.

      97. Friedman, Martin Buber’s Life and Work, 1:249.

      98. Martin Buber to Fritz Mauthner, May 7, 1919, in Buber, Letters, 244 (translation modified).

      99. Lunn, Prophet of Community, 338–39.

      100. Friedman, Martin Buber’s Life and Work, 1:257. Each of these three major events referred to by Friedman precipitated a crisis of loss for Buber. According СКАЧАТЬ