Deepwater Flexible Risers and Pipelines. Yong Bai
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Deepwater Flexible Risers and Pipelines - Yong Bai страница 27

Название: Deepwater Flexible Risers and Pipelines

Автор: Yong Bai

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Физика

Серия:

isbn: 9781119322733

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ pressure. As can be seen, before the yielding of the pressure armor, the results of the two methods are in good agreement. After the yielding occurs, the errors of the two methods begin to appear. The growth rate of the Mises stress obtained from FEM is slower than that from the theory. The main reason is that the self-locking of the pressure armor in the finite element method will cause the redistribution of stress in the section, which makes it difficult to predict the stress. While the theoretical method doesn’t take this change into consideration. After yielding, the maximum von Mises stress of two models keep increasing slowly and the Matlab’s reaches to the ultimate strength firstly. Generally speaking, the difference between the two methods is not very big. The analytical result is 71 MPa while numerical result is 74 MPa when the maximum von Mises stress reaches to the yield strength. As for getting to the ultimate strength, the analytical result is 75 MPa while the numerical result is 80 MPa.

Schematic illustration of the Mises stress of Z-shaped section. Graph depicts Pressure-maximum von Mises stress curve. Graph depicts Pressure-axial displacement curve. Graph depicts a Pressure-radial displacement curve.

      It can be found that the results in two models are in good agreement and the theoretical model has high accuracy in predicting the burst pressure of pipe. The results may be of interest to the manufacture factory engineers. It is convenient to design the structure of pipes by using the theoretical model under different internal pressure and different given radius. Other most simplify formulas are proposed in Handbook [6] which are shown in the below. The contribution of tensile armor to burst pressure resistance is expressed by

      (3.15) image

      (3.16) image

      where Rint is the inner radius of the layer. The contribution of the pressure armor to burst pressure resistance is expressed by

      (3.17) image

      where tj denotes the thickness of pressure spiral with layer number j and R is the mean radius of the Np pressure layers, respectively. The fill factor Ffj for pressure spiral wire layer j. The total hoop pressure resistance is the obtained by summing the contribution from each layer as

      (3.18) image

      The burst pressure is then given by the smallest of phoop and pa:

      (3.19) image

Models 207 GPa
Ultimate stress 960 MPa
Poisson radio 0.3
Profile 0.5 mm × 52 mm
Winding angle 54.7°
СКАЧАТЬ
Model Inner radius Layers
A1 25 mm Internal sheath + four layers steel strips + out sheath
A2 25 mm Internal sheath + six layers steel strips + out sheath
B1 50 mm Internal sheath + pressure armor + two tensile armors = out sheath