High Performance Boards. Didier Cossin
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу High Performance Boards - Didier Cossin страница 18

Название: High Performance Boards

Автор: Didier Cossin

Издательство: John Wiley & Sons Limited

Жанр: Корпоративная культура

Серия:

isbn: 9781119615699

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ Illustration depicting the roots of good judgement: mapping one’s strengths and weaknesses, an interplay between internal variables and external factors.

      Good judgement is especially important today, as boards face increasing external pressures and may have to deal with crises that challenge their decision-making skills. We will discuss crisis management in more detail in Chapter 12.

      Conflicts of interest are rampant in today's world. They arise when directors lose impartiality because of either material interest or a conflict of roles. When directors are in a position that may benefit them, or someone close to them, in any way, then they can no longer make impartial decisions; this is a material conflict of interest. A conflict may also result from one director having different roles, so that their obligations to one company are compromised by those to another. Directors who sit on multiple boards may therefore have a potential conflict if two of these organisations form any kind of relationship.

      Another source of conflict is self-interest. When directors focus primarily on maintaining their position, comfort, and income rather than on what is best for the company, they are likely to be highly biased. They may also become compliant and not wish to be unpopular. Again, they lose their impartiality.

      Sometimes directors fail to acknowledge conflicts of interest – even to themselves. It is critical that directors think about this honestly, because it has a direct impact on board service. All of us are conflicted, and figuring out these conflicts is part of our duty. We explore the four tiers of conflicts of interest facing boards in Chapter 13. A good rule of thumb is for board members to have a list of their own conflicts of interest: time, money, effort, friends, relationships, financial interests, reputation, social network, and more.

      For some, integrity means fully adopting the values one believes are right. This requires authentic deliberation about individual values through deep personal reflection, rather than a simple acceptance of social norms. Maintaining integrity means being able to resist engaging in self-deception about whether individual actions are the logical outcome of personal values or some other force (such as fulfilling psychological needs).

      Another definition of integrity is the ability to be clear about the boundaries of what is acceptable, and the commitment to stand by these regardless of the consequences. In other words, integrity is the way in which individuals support projects and then loyally commit to them. This is the case with artistic integrity, for example, when artists demonstrate loyalty to their vision and pursue their path, rather than conforming to what others think is right or acceptable or commercially valuable.

      Board members' specific legal responsibilities depend on the nature of the organisation and the jurisdiction within which the board operates. But clearly, successful directors need to have good judgement and the integrity to stand by what they believe. During crises, directors need to rise to the occasion, simplify the situation, and have the courage to do what is right.

Independence and IntegrityDo I say what I mean and mean what I say?Do I speak up when I fundamentally disagree with what someone has said – even if it may result in confrontation or ridicule?Am I clear about my role and legal responsibility as a director? Can I clearly and simply articulate my mandate and responsibility?How do I demonstrate accountability as a director?How do I feel about holding other directors accountable?Am I clear on what personal moral and ethical boundaries I will not cross, no matter what the consequences?Do I feel that I bring a fresh perspective to discussions – a different viewpoint or knowledge set – from the other directors? Equal Participation/Mutual RespectDo I contribute to the best of my ability in the boardroom?How curious am I about the company, what it does? How much time do I spend asking questions and seeking answers to these questions?Do I actively listen to others' contributions and respect their opinion, even if it is very different from mine?Can I understand the perspective of others – even if I don't agree with them? Openness and Constructive DissentAm I willing to express my viewpoint, even if I know it will be unpopular?Am I able to land sharp remarks in a positive and respectful way?Are there times when I hold back, due to a fear of how I may be perceived by the other directors?How do I ensure that I am not simply conforming with the group, but checking that my evaluation of issues is sound?How do I feel when others challenge my view?How actively do I challenge others' perspective and underlying assumptions? Critical Thinking and FramingHow do I ensure I am not falling prey to my own biases?Do I consistently reframe decisions presented in relative terms in absolute terms?Do I fear someone or something on this board? Conflicts of InterestHave I thoroughly considered my different business relationships and roles and how they influence one another (if at all)?How important is the income and status of this board seat? Does it affect my willingness to speak up? Knowledge AccelerationDo I seek external support when I feel that I need more knowledge in a certain area?How do I ensure that I continue to educate myself on topics that enable me to make an effective contribution, including professional service?Do I actively seek feedback from the Chair or other directors as to my knowledge and competence – and fill in necessary gaps?Do I have a firm grasp on the corporate governance code, pertinent regulations, and social expectation?Do I meet with key stakeholders?Do I regularly meet with other directors, beyond board meetings?

      1 1 Calhoun, C. (1995). Standing for something. The Journal of Philosophy 92(5): 235–260. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-362X%28199505%2992%3A5%3C235%3ASFS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст СКАЧАТЬ