Название: Charles Correa
Автор: Charles Correa
Издательство: Readbox publishing GmbH
Жанр: Языкознание
Серия: E-Books
isbn: 9783775734028
isbn:
For as an architect who has been influenced by the double heights and spatial pyrotechnics of Le Corbusier and Wright, it is particularly mortifying to note the entrance of the grand villain in such a movie. He almost always lives in a duplex apartment, or a house with several double-height spaces, so that he can come prancing down the stairs to deliver a particularly cruel line. Architecture as the expression of power—monetary, political, physical—is a nexus not perceived by most architects, but one which is palpably vivid to Indians gathered around a TV screen.
IV
Another area where architecture triggers subtle and metaphysical feelings within us is the phenomenon of open-to-sky spaces. In fact, because of their extraordinary qualities (which we have discussed earlier), these spaces provide the key to one of the most daunting issues facing the nation—the task of providing an environment for the urban poor. Today our towns and cities, like those elsewhere in the Third World, are being engulfed by tidal wave of distress migration from the rural hinterland. Their growth rate is phenomenal. Over the last decade or two, in many of these urban centres, while the overall population has doubled, the squatters have increased five-fold—or more.
Attempts to deal with this phenomenon through the construction of ‘low-cost’ housing built of brick and concrete have proved abortive, since they are far beyond the earning capacity of the poor and so end up being transferred (often illegally) to the middle class. Nor is it possible to subsidize such construction on a national scale—since there are great many other priorities (food, health, education, job generation) competing for such meagre resources as do exist.
Which brings us perhaps to the most crucial issue facing architects in India today: how does one create an architecture that is relevant to the millions upon millions of India’s poor? We need not only economical construction that provides basic shelter, but a real habitat that allows them to live with their own mythic imagery, their dreams, their aspirations. And in today’s India, what would these be? The TV antenna? The neon light? The nylon sari? These for the majority of our people, are powerful and legitimate symbols, co-existing in their lives with the yantra on the wall, the bindu on the forehead. For as we have already seen, the sacred realm does not consist only of formalized religion; on the contrary, popular reincarnations of ancient and contemporary myths also act as potent motivators in our society. In fact, just when one fears that in a modern city like Mumbai, all this rehashing of Vedic mythology is not relevant, one suddenly sees, less than a hundred yards away in a squatter hovel, a family making a rangoli pattern on the floor, re-enacting their version of those ancient myths in the real crunch of everyday life.
Mythic imagery, old and new:
Rangoli on the floor . . .
. . . the television aerial . . .
. . . the wayside shrine
For our habitat is not created in a vacuum—it is the compulsive expression of beliefs and aspirations (implicit and explicit) that are central to our lives. India consists of an incredibly rich reservoir of images and beliefs, like the transparent layers of a palimpsest—with all the colours and all the patterns equally vivid—starting with the models of the cosmos and continuing down to our time. And it is the continuing presence of these layers in our lives that creates the pluralism of our contemporary society. In this respect, India is different from, say, the United States. For although American society can also be described as increasingly pluralistic and multi-religious, these are religions with most of their myths castrated—which is perhaps why in any college chapel or airport lounge you can use the same bare table for a Christian ceremony, followed by a Jewish one, then a Muslim, then a Buddhist and so forth. This would be impossible in India! Here one sometimes feels that no myth has ever been diluted or lost. Today they all coexist, riding together into the sunset.
And their presence decisively shapes our behaviour. Certainly it encourages us, even in a crisis, to take the ‘soft’ option, since a pluralistic construct allows us to avoid having to make a clear choice (nothing is either black or white). This palimpsest allows us to avoid confrontation in other ways as well. Consider, for instance, a typical bazaar. The apparent chaos and disorder here, on close observation, actually consists of several layers of order, all superimposed. Over the centuries, this ‘chaos’ has functioned as a self-defense system, protecting society against agents of change. After all, how does one ‘improve’ upon chaos? If you were to enter a room where all the tables and chairs were upside down and the beds unmade, you would hardly be able to decide precisely what modifications to carry out—for the simple reason that you would not know what you were looking at. If, on the other hand, everything was in simplistic, apple-pie order, suggestions would leap to your mind—and the room would be extremely vulnerable to your intervention. That is why, after two and a half centuries of trying, the British were not able to fundamentally restructure India. Essentially, and for much of the time, they didn’t know what they were looking at! This is perhaps also the reason why Japan (which, as a society, has always been kept in spic-and-span order) could be changed so decisively, in just a handful of years, by General Douglas MacArthur. He could easily see what he thought needed repositioning.
Another significant characteristic of chaos, or apparent chaos, is its metaphysical value. The Chinese have a high regard for what they call the Dragon of Disorder. They feel it helps to balance life. Perhaps it evokes in us an awareness of the non-manifest. A few years ago, a well known architect drew up an urban design scheme for the banks of the Tigris river in Baghdad—proposals inspired by the meticulously manicured banks of the Seine at the Ile de la Cite in Paris. An Iraqi poet protested: Where then would be the legendary Tigris of his youth, the Tigris of ancient myth—a primordial river flowing through ambiguous and amorphous mud banks? His eloquence was very moving.
The ghats at Benaras: a metaphor for human existence
Does Kailash destroy the mountain—or preserve it?
And I thought to myself: What would happen to Benaras if the river Ganges were redeveloped to look like the Seine? If you took the myriad activities that occur every day along the ghats—the ritualistic bathing of pilgrims, the cremation of bodies, the reading of horoscopes by astrologers, the chanting of Brahmin priests, and the boatloads of tourists clicking away with their cameras—if you took all these activities and placed them on the manicured quays of Paris, what would you get? The compound of a general hospital? The big scene of a disaster movie? In the context of Benaras, on the contrary, this tableau becomes a metaphor for human existence. It makes you reflect on the metaphysics of life. Why is this? Precisely because on the far side of the holy river, the landscape is empty and shrouded in mists, stretches flat and enigmatic, as far as the horizon.
This complex and ambiguous relationship between man and nature is central to Indian architecture. Europeans—starting with the ancient Greeks—have habitually conceived of architecture as a man-made object, complementing nature and quite separate from it. Hence the Parthenon on the Acropolis СКАЧАТЬ