Tell the Bosses We're Coming. Shaun Richman

Чтение книги онлайн.

      The System Is a Trap

      WHY CAN’T UNIONS GROW?

      In an age of rampant inequality, at a time of increasing social protest, including a notable uptick in workers’ strikes, and when a majority of workers say they want to be union members, why does union density continue to decline?

      The reason is that we have structural problems, lots of them, one piled on top of another. The system of labor relations that came out of the New Deal and matured in the post–Second World War era has evolved into a complex and insidious trap. This trap prevents workers who want to join unions from doing so. It legally restricts workers’ rights to protest our routine use and abuse by rich and powerful corporations. It confines unions to sectors of the economy that are not growing. It gives bosses veto power over whether a new union can even be formed in a workplace. It sharply narrows the scope of issues that unions can even put on the bargaining table.

      The combination of exclusive union representation, mandatory agency fees, no-strike clauses, and “management rights” are the foundation of our peculiar “union shop.” No other country structures its labor relations system quite like this. Our labor system didn’t always look like this. It developed through a series of historical accidents. It has been made unworkable by a dogged anti-union legal campaign run by the vast right-wing conspiracy of think tanks, industry lobbyists, and bloodthirsty billionaires.

      The system has become a trap.

      Part of the trap, however, is in our own heads. Too many union activists and allies take for granted what a union is—how it should be organized, what collective bargaining looks like.

      There’s an analogy that makes the rounds in Cornell University’s labor extension programs. It involves a man sharing his grandma’s pot roast recipe with a friend. The first step of the recipe calls for cutting the ends off the raw rump, which prompts the friend to ask, “Really? Does that, like, make the roast more tender—or what?”

      The man sharing the recipe, who had never questioned why it called for the ends to be cut off, calls his mom to ask why the recipe calls for the ends of the rump roast to be cut off. She confesses that she never thought about it either and suggests that her older sister might know. So the man proceeds to call his aunt who is similarly thrown off by the simple question. She had never questioned why the recipe called for this bit of home butchery. All she knew is that the dish she made when following the recipe tasted good; it tasted familiar.

      And so on and so forth as this man called through the family historians and home cooks until he finally visits his grandma at the nursing home. And she dismissively explains, “Oh, it’s because the grocer only sold rump roasts that were too big for our roast pan.”

      This is the most devastatingly on-the-nose analogy for how unions engage in long-term strategy. We hope and assume that sometime in the past, someone smarter than we are considered all the possible options and settled on what we are currently doing as the best possible choice.

      We want there to be more unions and assume that means more unions that are just like our current unions. And so we get excited for silver bullet solutions like forgoing NLRB elections in favor of majority sign-up (or “card check”) certifications or overturning right-to-work that seem like they would help unions grow.

      Even when we argue among ourselves about how unions need to change to win more, we nibble around the edges of what the problem is. More robust union organizing departments running comprehensive organizing campaigns would be good and valuable, just as more face-to-face organizing conversations in existing union shops and networks of trained workplace leaders would revitalize many unions. But these won’t grow the labor movement in any appreciable way, because we’re still trapped in a rotten anti-union system.

       Organizing Won’t Save Us

      How can I so casually and confidently assert that more organizing won’t significantly add to the ranks of union membership? Because it hasn’t.

      We are nearly a quarter-century into what I call the “organize or die” push by unions to significantly increase the amount of money and energy they spend on new union organizing. Of course, when it comes to organizing many unions talk the talk but fail to walk the walk. I’ll discuss some of the reasons why in chapter 4.

      However, there are unions that have developed and actually maintained fidelity to organizing model strategies, putting hundreds of organizers in the field and successfully organizing thousands of bargaining units and new union members. These unions have survived, but they have not thrived. They have not greatly increased their density or their power. And the millions of workers who want to be union members remain outside the labor movement’s ranks.

      When most of us speak of the “organizing model,” we are talking about methods of organizing within our broken system that may vary from each other slightly but are all informed by the research of Dr. Kate Bronfenbrenner at Cornell. Dr. Bronfenbrenner identified ten “comprehensive organizing tactics” from her own previous organizing experience. These include:

      1. Adequate and appropriate staff and financial resources. This means not just putting enough staff organizers on the ground—Bronfenbrenner recommends a ratio of one staffer for every one hundred workers—but also research and communications support and enough money to take out ads, hold rallies, get buttons and T-shirts for the activists.

      2. Strategic targeting. Organizing employees in the same or related industries so that both the workers you are seeking to organize and the members you are asking to help see this as a reasonable plan to gain power.

      3. СКАЧАТЬ