Feminism: The Ugly Truth. Mike J.D. Buchanan

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ year after posting my questions I was still awaiting a reply. But maybe, just maybe, the man was smarter than we might otherwise have given him credit for. For an interesting perspective on male feminists we turn to an extract from a book published in 2008, Men are Better than Women, penned by the American author Dick Masterson. Let’s leave the last words in this chapter to the estimable Dick:

      Manginas are my heroes

      Male feminists, or ‘manginas’ as they prefer to be called, are so misogynistic they make Andrew Dice Clay [Author’s note: a notably politically-incorrect, i.e. funny, American comedian] look like The Little Mermaid. The Little Mermaid is the seashell-on-the-boobs cartoon character from Disney.

      Not all men have money, good looks, talent, wit, charm, charisma, interesting stories, cultural insights, skills, athletic abilities, political acumen, macho attitudes, an ability to eat an inhuman amount of food or other non-toxic products, a sense of style, an easygoing demeanour, video games, a sweet car, a spa, or an in-depth knowledge of everything. All men, however, are still men. That means they need to get laid and will always find a way. How do these men attract women, then? I’ll tell you how – by taking charge where women have failed for the last thirty years: by being feminists.

      Manginas are my heroes. They fight the fight that women declared for absolutely no reason and then completely failed at. Who else but a man could convince a woman that being a male feminist is not only possible, but also not the most chauvinistic thing anyone has ever done in the history of the world?

      I’ll tell you who, fucking no one! But men have done that shit. Men are like hypnosis masters when it comes to telling women what they want and what they should think about everything. Manginas are the biggest and most ingenious misogynists. It’s perfectly natural and perfectly manly for a man to stoop so low as to cheapen his entire gender just to get laid. Men don’t need a collective pat on the ass for everything we do in life. We’re born with dicks and dignity, and neither can be taken away. We don’t need a sash that counts up all our achievements and chafes our necks. That’s for Girl Scouts, and the only thing I want to know about Girl Scouts is when they sell their cookies.

      On a personal note, I have nothing against misogynism, or whatever it’s called. I wouldn’t call myself a misogynist, but that’s a little like not calling a square a rectangle. Manginas are some of the manliest men on earth, because they know deep down within their stomachs that women can’t stand up for themselves without a firm hand firmly supporting them by the ass. It’s a throwback to chivalry that says, ‘Sweetheart, if you want anyone to take your rights seriously, shut up and let a man do the talking’.

      17| TOM MARTIN

      It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.

      Robert F Kennedy 1925-68 American Democratic senator: South Africa (1966)

      When the history of the war against feminism is written – and that may be many years in the future – a Scotsman, Tom Martin, will surely merit an honourable mention. By the time of writing, late January 2012, his name had become well known in anti-feminism circles. From his website Sexismbusters.org:

      ‘Tom Martin began studying a Masters degree at the Gender Institute of The London School of Economics (LSE) in the 2009/10 term but withdrew after only six weeks, complaining the curriculum discriminated against men.

      The elite university’s own internal investigation found ‘no evidence of discrimination’, but Tom, unsatisfied with their conclusion, has filed 200 pages of evidence, in a damages claim at the Central London County Court, for ‘sex discrimination, breach of contract, misleading advertising, misrepresentation, and breach of The Gender Equality Duty Act’.

      Tom says, ‘as well as sexist teaching practices, sex-discriminatory learning materials were explicitly ruled out by the university’s own regulations, yet the core texts we had to read before each class, contained lots of anti-male discrimination and bias heavily focussing on and exaggerating women’s issues, whilst blaming men, ignoring men’s issues, and even recommending such bias. There was no warning of this sexist agenda in the prospectus.’

      Tom has paid for and received expert legal advice from a specialist education lawyer and a specialist education barrister, who believe his case has a very strong chance of success.

      Tom, who has read the law and is representing himself in court, has set up a legal fighting fund which has received 90 donations from eight countries around the world, totalling £3,050 to date – enough to cover some expenses, court hearing fees, and a few further hours’ legal advice. A big thank you to all those who have donated so far.

      In order to give this case the best possible chance of success, so Tom can receive the necessary amount of legal coaching and take the campaign to the next level in order to generate and win the pre-trial media debate as well, Tom asks people to donate what they can now. [Author’s note: there’s a facility on the website for making donations by credit card.]

      He’s working 90 hours a week on this potentially game-changing lawsuit, so future generations of boys and men might automatically receive equality in their education.’

      The site includes a link to an interesting video in which Tom asks LSE students whether they think discrimination against men in the curriculum is justified, as the defence have argued:

       Youtube.com/watch?v=6y9_oklmHvU

      The case is attracting the attention of leading newspapers, and we must hope that all this leads to greater exposure of the true nature of the gender programmes run by feminist ‘academics’. The implications of a victory for Tom Martin in the case would be – one hopes and assumes – a requirement for a complete overhaul of such courses in the UK. Now wouldn’t that be worth celebrating? Perhaps once the anti-male elements of the courses are removed, the courses could be run over the course of a week rather than a year.

      Конец ознакомительного фрагмента.

      Текст предоставлен ООО «ЛитРес».

      Прочитайте эту книгу целиком, купив полную легальную версию на ЛитРес.

      Безопасно оплатить книгу можно банковской картой Visa, MasterCard, Maestro, со счета мобильного телефона, с платежного терминала, в салоне МТС или Связной, через PayPal, WebMoney, Яндекс.Деньги, QIWI Кошелек, бонусными картами или другим удобным Вам способом.

/9j/4AAQSkZJRgABAQEASABIAAD/4QCARXhpZgAATU0AKgAAAAgABQESAAMAAAABAAEAAAAAAAEA AAABAAAASgEbAAUAAAABAAAAUgEoAAMAAAABAAIAAIdpAAQAAAABAAAAWgAAAAAAAABIAAAAAQAA AEgAAAABAAKgAgAEAAAAAQAAAh2gAwAEAAAAAQAAA0gAAAAA/+IYqElDQ19QUk9GSUxFAAEBAAAY mGFwcGwCEAA СКАЧАТЬ