Название: Dancing with the Gods
Автор: Kent Nerburn
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Личностный рост
isbn: 9781786891167
isbn:
14. The Architect and the Gardener:
The magic of accident and faith in the unknown
The fine art of the appropriate choice
The hard decision to leave works behind
18. Many Hands and a Common Heart:
The joys and challenges of collaboration
19. The Solace of Unlikely Friends:
The wisdom and insight of other arts
20. On the Shoulders of Giants:
The magical bond of artists across time and space
21. The Fist in the Velvet Glove:
22. The Voice that Cannot Be Stilled:
Why art matters in a world of human need
23. The Eternal Youth of the Endless Imagination:
The power of art to keep the heart young
Coda: Expressing the Inexpressible
Art is a spiritual pursuitIt is wrestling with the angelsIt is dancing with the gods
Introduction:
Dreams and Fears
Choosing the artist’s life
‘Inside you there’s an artist you don’t know about.’ Rumi
RECENTLY I RECEIVED a note from a young woman named Jennifer who was questioning her decision to pursue a life in the arts. She had a dream, she felt a calling, but she was feeling alone and misunderstood.
‘Is it worth it?’ she asked. ‘Is it possible? What advice can you give me?’
Her letter touched me. It mirrored the doubts and yearnings of my own youth. Though I couldn’t tell her what to do, I wanted to respond.
This is what I wrote to her:
Dear Jennifer,Thank you for your kind letter. You honour me by thinking that I might have some advice to offer on your questions about devoting your life to the arts. It takes great courage to reach out to a person you don’t know because something in their work touches a chord in you and resonates with that private, unspoken place of your dreams. I know, because I did the same when I was younger. In my case, it was to Norman Mailer.
Why I chose Norman Mailer, I don’t know. I certainly didn’t find his emotional sensibilities attuned to mine. His work, though powerful, was not consonant with my own literary spirit. I think it was because there was a muscularity in his intellectual manner that I felt was lacking in my own life. I had just begun a graduate programme at Stanford University, and the combination of the intellectual demands of the academic life and the shock of a new living and learning environment – graduate school, at least at that time, was a far different animal than undergraduate school – made me feel ever further from the living streets and ordinary people where I felt most vibrant and alive. Mr Mailer’s work probably gave me hope that there was a way to be intelligent without being an intellectual, and that a life on the streets did not negate a life of the mind.
Whatever it was, I wrote him, and though I do not have a copy of the letter, I can guess what I said. It was likely very much like your letter – confessional, almost pleading, a lifeline thrown to a person whose life and accomplishments seemed to resonate with what I wanted for myself and what so few others seemed to understand. I suppose I wanted a helping hand, or maybe an occupational road map, or maybe just the simple acknowledgement that my plight and dreams were real and worthy.
I do remember that I asked if I could come to New York and work with him – a request that makes me blush even now when I think of it. But Mr Mailer, gruff though he might have seemed in his public persona, wrote back with gentle compassion.
I have the note still today, written on a manual typewriter and signed with a fountain pen. I’ll share it with you in its entirety because it speaks to the generosity of the man: