The Spectacle of Disintegration. Маккензи Уорк
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу The Spectacle of Disintegration - Маккензи Уорк страница 1

Название: The Spectacle of Disintegration

Автор: Маккензи Уорк

Издательство: Ingram

Жанр: Философия

Серия:

isbn: 9781781684665

isbn:

СКАЧАТЬ d="u7fdd4f8c-6b39-5837-999d-2fa9a8e32bd5">

      

      THE SPECTACLE OF DISINTEGRATION

      McKENZIE WARK

       Dedication

      In memory of:

      Mark Poster

      The mode of information

      Bernard Smith

      Place, taste and tradition

      Adam Cullen

      The otherness when it comes

       Epigraph

      It may not be what it looks to lack totality.

      Anna Mendelssohn

      I sense the River Neckinger beneath the paving slabs, the queasy toxicity shifting to St. Saviours dock.

      Laura Oldfield Ford

      Contents

       Cover

       Title Page

      Dedication

      Epigraph

      1 Widening Gyres

      2 The Critique of Everyday Life

      3 Liberty Guiding the People

       7 Détournement as Utopia

       8 Charles Fourier’s Queer Theory

       9 The Ass Dreams of China Pop

       10 Mao by Mao

       11 The Occulted State

       12 The Last Chance to Save Capitalism

       13 Anti-Cinema

       14 The Devil’s Party

       15 Guy Debord, His Art and Times

       16 A Romany Detour

       17 The Language of Discretion

       18 Game of War

       19 The Strategist

       20 The Inhuman Comedy

       Acknowledgments

       Notes

       Index

       Copyright

       1 Widening Gyres

      A person of sharp observation and sound judgment governs objects rather than being governed by them.

      Baltasar Gracián

      When the storm hit the Hansa Carrier, twenty-one shipping containers fell from its decks into the Pacific Ocean, taking some 80,000 Nike sneakers with them. Seattle-based oceanographer Curtis Ebbesmeyer used the serial numbers from the sneakers that washed up on the rain coast of North America to plot the widening gyre of ocean-going garbage that usually lies between California and Hawaii. Bigger than the state of Texas, it is called the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, and sailors have known for a long time to steer clear of this area from the equator to fifty degrees north.

      It’s an often windless desert where not much lives. Flotsam gathers and circles, biodegrading into the sea. Unless it is plastic, which merely photo-degrades in the sun, disintegrating into smaller and smaller bits of sameness. Now the sea here has more particles of plastic than plankton. The Gyre is a disowned country of furniture, fridges, cigarette lighters, televisions, bobbing in the sea and slowly falling apart, but refusing to go away.1

      New Hawaii is the name some humorists prefer for the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre now that it has the convenience of contemporary consumer goods. Or one might call it a spectacle of disintegration. It is as good an emblem as any of the passing show of contemporary life, with its jetsam of jostling plastic artifacts, all twisting higgledy-piggledy on and below the surface of the ocean. Plastic and ocean remain separate, even as the plastic breaks up and permeates the water, insinuating itself into it but always alien to it.

      The poet Lautréamont once wrote: “Old Ocean, you are the symbol of identity: always equal to yourself … and if somewhere your waves are enraged, further off in some other zone they are in the most complete calm.”2 But this no longer describes the ocean, which now appears as far from equilibrium. It describes instead the spectacle, the Sargasso Sea of images, a perpetual calm surrounded by turbulence, at the center always the same.

      When Guy Debord published The Society of the Spectacle (1967), he thought there were two kinds: the concentrated and the diffuse spectacle. The concentrated spectacle was limited to fascist and Stalinist states, where the spectacle cohered around a cult of personality. These are rare now, if not entirely extinct. The diffuse spectacle emerged as the dominant form. It did not require a Stalin or Mao as its central image. Big Brother is no longer watching you. In His place is little sister and her friends: endless pictures of models and other pretty things. The diffuse spectacle murmured to its sleeping peoples: “what appears is good; what is good appears.”3

      The victory of the diffuse spectacle over its concentrated cousin did not lead to the diffusion of the victor over the surface of the world. In Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (1988), Debord thought instead that an integrated spectacle had subsumed elements of both into a new spectacular universe. While on the surface it looked like the diffuse spectacle, which molds desire in the form of the commodity, it bore within it aspects of concentration, notably an occulted state, where power tends to become less and less transparent.

      That the state is a mystery to its subjects is to be expected; that it could become occult even to its rulers is something else. The integrated spectacle not only extended the spectacle outwards, but also inwards; the falsification of the world had reached by this point even those in charge of it. Debord wrote in 1978 that “it has become ungovernable, this wasteland, where new sufferings are disguised with the names of former pleasures; and where the people are so afraid … Rumor has it that those who were expropriating it have, to crown it all, mislaid it. Here is a civilization СКАЧАТЬ