Software Reliability A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Software Reliability A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 7

СКАЧАТЬ Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      61. Is there a Software reliability management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      62. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      63. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      64. What are the rough order estimates on cost savings/opportunities that Software reliability brings?

      <--- Score

      65. Is Software reliability currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      66. Has the Software reliability work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      67. Is the scope of Software reliability defined?

      <--- Score

      68. What gets examined?

      <--- Score

      69. Is there a critical path to deliver Software reliability results?

      <--- Score

      70. Is special Software reliability user knowledge required?

      <--- Score

      71. How have you defined all Software reliability requirements first?

      <--- Score

      72. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      73. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      74. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity be dealt with to ensure that the expected Software reliability results are met?

      <--- Score

      75. Is Software reliability required?

      <--- Score

      76. Is the Software reliability scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      77. What is the scope of the Software reliability work?

      <--- Score

      78. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      79. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      80. Is there a clear Software reliability case definition?

      <--- Score

      81. What are the requirements for audit information?

      <--- Score

      82. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      83. Has/have the customer(s) been identified?

      <--- Score

      84. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      85. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      86. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      87. What are (control) requirements for Software reliability Information?

      <--- Score

      88. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      89. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      90. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      91. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      92. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      93. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      94. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      95. What are the core elements of the Software reliability business case?

      <--- Score

      96. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      97. How would you define the culture at your organization, how susceptible is it to Software reliability changes?

      <--- Score

      98. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?

      <--- Score

      99. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      100. Are accountability and ownership for Software reliability clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      101. How do you manage unclear Software reliability requirements?

      <--- Score

      102. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Software reliability work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      103. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      104. СКАЧАТЬ