Threat And Risk Assessment A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Score

      97. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      98. How do you hand over Threat and risk assessment context?

      <--- Score

      99. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      100. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      101. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      102. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      103. What are the dynamics of the communication plan?

      <--- Score

      104. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      105. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?

      <--- Score

      106. What defines best in class?

      <--- Score

      107. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      108. How do you manage scope?

      <--- Score

      109. How do you gather the stories?

      <--- Score

      110. Are required metrics defined, what are they?

      <--- Score

      111. Do you all define Threat and risk assessment in the same way?

      <--- Score

      112. Will a Threat and risk assessment production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      113. How do you catch Threat and risk assessment definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      114. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      115. Is the Threat and risk assessment scope manageable?

      <--- Score

      116. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      117. Has the Threat and risk assessment work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      118. Have all basic functions of Threat and risk assessment been defined?

      <--- Score

      119. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      120. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?

      <--- Score

      121. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      122. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      123. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      124. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      125. Do you have a Threat and risk assessment success story or case study ready to tell and share?

      <--- Score

      126. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?

      <--- Score

      127. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      128. How do you gather requirements?

      <--- Score

      129. Who are the Threat and risk assessment improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      130. What are the compelling stakeholder reasons for embarking on Threat and risk assessment?

      <--- Score

      131. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      132. Are accountability and ownership for Threat and risk assessment clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      133. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section

      Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section

      Transfer your score to the Threat and risk assessment Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.

      CRITERION #3: MEASURE:

      INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.

      In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:

      5 Strongly Agree

      4 Agree

      3 Neutral

      2 Disagree

      1 Strongly Disagree

СКАЧАТЬ