Automated Pain Recognition A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Have specific policy objectives been defined?

      <--- Score

      96. Are there different segments of customers?

      <--- Score

      97. Has the Automated Pain Recognition work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      98. Is Automated Pain Recognition currently on schedule according to the plan?

      <--- Score

      99. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      100. When is/was the Automated Pain Recognition start date?

      <--- Score

      101. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      102. What system do you use for gathering Automated Pain Recognition information?

      <--- Score

      103. What is the scope of Automated Pain Recognition?

      <--- Score

      104. How do you think the partners involved in Automated Pain Recognition would have defined success?

      <--- Score

      105. How do you hand over Automated Pain Recognition context?

      <--- Score

      106. Who approved the Automated Pain Recognition scope?

      <--- Score

      107. What information do you gather?

      <--- Score

      108. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?

      <--- Score

      109. Is there a Automated Pain Recognition management charter, including stakeholder case, problem and goal statements, scope, milestones, roles and responsibilities, communication plan?

      <--- Score

      110. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      111. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      112. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      113. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      114. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      115. What scope to assess?

      <--- Score

      116. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      117. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      118. What Automated Pain Recognition services do you require?

      <--- Score

      119. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?

      <--- Score

      120. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      121. How did the Automated Pain Recognition manager receive input to the development of a Automated Pain Recognition improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      122. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      123. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?

      <--- Score

      124. What are (control) requirements for Automated Pain Recognition Information?

      <--- Score

      125. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      126. Is there any additional Automated Pain Recognition definition of success?

      <--- Score

      127. Why are you doing Automated Pain Recognition and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      128. How can the value of Automated Pain Recognition be defined?

      <--- Score

      129. How do you gather Automated Pain Recognition requirements?

      <--- Score

      130. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      131. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      132. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Automated Pain Recognition work? How is the team addressing them?

      <--- Score

      133. How will the Automated Pain Recognition team and the group measure complete success of Automated Pain Recognition?

      <--- Score

      134. What are the Automated Pain Recognition tasks and definitions?

      <--- Score

      135. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      136. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?

      <--- Score

      137. СКАЧАТЬ