Название: Error Level Analysis A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867460558
isbn:
74. Think about the people you identified for your Error level analysis project and the project responsibilities you would assign to them, what kind of training do you think they would need to perform these responsibilities effectively?
<--- Score
75. What Error level analysis coordination do you need?
<--- Score
76. What should be considered when identifying available resources, constraints, and deadlines?
<--- Score
77. What prevents you from making the changes you know will make you a more effective Error level analysis leader?
<--- Score
78. Why the need?
<--- Score
79. Are there any specific expectations or concerns about the Error level analysis team, Error level analysis itself?
<--- Score
80. What would happen if Error level analysis weren’t done?
<--- Score
81. How do you recognize an Error level analysis objection?
<--- Score
82. What creative shifts do you need to take?
<--- Score
83. Is the quality assurance team identified?
<--- Score
84. Who should resolve the Error level analysis issues?
<--- Score
85. What needs to be done?
<--- Score
86. Does Error level analysis create potential expectations in other areas that need to be recognized and considered?
<--- Score
87. What Error level analysis capabilities do you need?
<--- Score
88. What tools and technologies are needed for a custom Error level analysis project?
<--- Score
89. How do you identify the kinds of information that you will need?
<--- Score
90. Is it clear when you think of the day ahead of you what activities and tasks you need to complete?
<--- Score
91. How do you assess your Error level analysis workforce capability and capacity needs, including skills, competencies, and staffing levels?
<--- Score
92. How are the Error level analysis’s objectives aligned to the group’s overall stakeholder strategy?
<--- Score
93. Who else hopes to benefit from it?
<--- Score
94. What is the recognized need?
<--- Score
95. Are employees recognized for desired behaviors?
<--- Score
96. Are there any revenue recognition issues?
<--- Score
97. Do you know what you need to know about Error level analysis?
<--- Score
98. What is the smallest subset of the problem you can usefully solve?
<--- Score
99. Who are your key stakeholders who need to sign off?
<--- Score
100. Are employees recognized or rewarded for performance that demonstrates the highest levels of integrity?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Error level analysis Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #2: DEFINE:
INTENT: Formulate the stakeholder problem. Define the problem, needs and objectives.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 Strongly Agree
4 Agree
3 Neutral
2 Disagree
1 Strongly Disagree
1. What specifically is the problem? Where does it occur? When does it occur? What is its extent?
<--- Score
2. Is there a completed, verified, and validated high-level ‘as is’ (not ‘should be’ or ‘could be’) stakeholder process map?
<--- Score
3. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?
<--- Score
4. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
5. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
6. Are the Error level analysis requirements complete?
<--- Score
7. Why are you doing Error level analysis and what is the scope?
<--- Score
8. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
9. Are the Error level analysis requirements testable?
<--- Score
10. Does the scope remain the same?
<--- Score
11. СКАЧАТЬ