Distributed Data Protocol A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ Will team members perform Distributed Data Protocol work when assigned and in a timely fashion?

      <--- Score

      13. How does the Distributed Data Protocol manager ensure against scope creep?

      <--- Score

      14. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?

      <--- Score

      15. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      16. Is the team formed and are team leaders (Coaches and Management Leads) assigned?

      <--- Score

      17. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?

      <--- Score

      18. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?

      <--- Score

      19. Has a project plan, Gantt chart, or similar been developed/completed?

      <--- Score

      20. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      21. How do you build the right business case?

      <--- Score

      22. What is the scope of the Distributed Data Protocol effort?

      <--- Score

      23. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?

      <--- Score

      24. What are the Distributed Data Protocol use cases?

      <--- Score

      25. How have you defined all Distributed Data Protocol requirements first?

      <--- Score

      26. Who are the Distributed Data Protocol improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?

      <--- Score

      27. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?

      <--- Score

      28. What is the definition of Distributed Data Protocol excellence?

      <--- Score

      29. What sort of initial information to gather?

      <--- Score

      30. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      31. Is scope creep really all bad news?

      <--- Score

      32. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      33. Has your scope been defined?

      <--- Score

      34. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?

      <--- Score

      35. Are resources adequate for the scope?

      <--- Score

      36. Who is gathering Distributed Data Protocol information?

      <--- Score

      37. When is/was the Distributed Data Protocol start date?

      <--- Score

      38. What are the record-keeping requirements of Distributed Data Protocol activities?

      <--- Score

      39. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      40. What is the scope of the Distributed Data Protocol work?

      <--- Score

      41. Why are you doing Distributed Data Protocol and what is the scope?

      <--- Score

      42. What are (control) requirements for Distributed Data Protocol Information?

      <--- Score

      43. Is the Distributed Data Protocol scope complete and appropriately sized?

      <--- Score

      44. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      45. What is out-of-scope initially?

      <--- Score

      46. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      47. Are accountability and ownership for Distributed Data Protocol clearly defined?

      <--- Score

      48. What are the boundaries of the scope? What is in bounds and what is not? What is the start point? What is the stop point?

      <--- Score

      49. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?

      <--- Score

      50. How do you gather Distributed Data Protocol requirements?

      <--- Score

      51. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Distributed Data Protocol? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      52. Has the Distributed Data Protocol work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      53. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      54. What knowledge or experience is required?

      <--- Score

      55. How will variation in the actual durations of each activity СКАЧАТЬ