Control System Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition. Gerardus Blokdyk
Чтение книги онлайн.

Читать онлайн книгу Control System Engineering A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition - Gerardus Blokdyk страница 6

СКАЧАТЬ What happens if Control system engineering’s scope changes?

      <--- Score

      15. Is there any additional Control system engineering definition of success?

      <--- Score

      16. Have the customer needs been translated into specific, measurable requirements? How?

      <--- Score

      17. Do you all define Control system engineering in the same way?

      <--- Score

      18. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?

      <--- Score

      19. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?

      <--- Score

      20. What is the scope of Control system engineering?

      <--- Score

      21. How did the Control system engineering manager receive input to the development of a Control system engineering improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?

      <--- Score

      22. Where can you gather more information?

      <--- Score

      23. How do you catch Control system engineering definition inconsistencies?

      <--- Score

      24. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      25. What are (control) requirements for Control system engineering Information?

      <--- Score

      26. What Control system engineering requirements should be gathered?

      <--- Score

      27. How do you keep key subject matter experts in the loop?

      <--- Score

      28. What information should you gather?

      <--- Score

      29. What critical content must be communicated – who, what, when, where, and how?

      <--- Score

      30. What constraints exist that might impact the team?

      <--- Score

      31. How do you hand over Control system engineering context?

      <--- Score

      32. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?

      <--- Score

      33. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Control system engineering leverage and how?

      <--- Score

      34. What was the context?

      <--- Score

      35. Is it clearly defined in and to your organization what you do?

      <--- Score

      36. What is the scope of the Control system engineering effort?

      <--- Score

      37. What would be the goal or target for a Control system engineering’s improvement team?

      <--- Score

      38. Will a Control system engineering production readiness review be required?

      <--- Score

      39. Who is gathering information?

      <--- Score

      40. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?

      <--- Score

      41. How are consistent Control system engineering definitions important?

      <--- Score

      42. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?

      <--- Score

      43. What is the definition of success?

      <--- Score

      44. How often are the team meetings?

      <--- Score

      45. Has the Control system engineering work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?

      <--- Score

      46. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?

      <--- Score

      47. What is out of scope?

      <--- Score

      48. Has the direction changed at all during the course of Control system engineering? If so, when did it change and why?

      <--- Score

      49. Does the scope remain the same?

      <--- Score

      50. Is there a clear Control system engineering case definition?

      <--- Score

      51. What is the worst case scenario?

      <--- Score

      52. What is the definition of Control system engineering excellence?

      <--- Score

      53. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?

      <--- Score

      54. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?

      <--- Score

      55. Does the team have regular meetings?

      <--- Score

      56. Has a high-level ‘as is’ process map been completed, verified and validated?

      <--- Score

      57. How have you defined СКАЧАТЬ