Название: Health Action Process Approach A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867459613
isbn:
<--- Score
8. Has the improvement team collected the ‘voice of the customer’ (obtained feedback – qualitative and quantitative)?
<--- Score
9. How is the team tracking and documenting its work?
<--- Score
10. When is/was the Health action process approach start date?
<--- Score
11. Is the current ‘as is’ process being followed? If not, what are the discrepancies?
<--- Score
12. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
13. Are audit criteria, scope, frequency and methods defined?
<--- Score
14. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
15. What would be the goal or target for a Health action process approach’s improvement team?
<--- Score
16. Has everyone on the team, including the team leaders, been properly trained?
<--- Score
17. Is there any additional Health action process approach definition of success?
<--- Score
18. How does the Health action process approach manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
19. How would you define Health action process approach leadership?
<--- Score
20. What is the scope of the Health action process approach work?
<--- Score
21. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
22. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- Score
23. Are the Health action process approach requirements complete?
<--- Score
24. How have you defined all Health action process approach requirements first?
<--- Score
25. Is there a critical path to deliver Health action process approach results?
<--- Score
26. What are the Roles and Responsibilities for each team member and its leadership? Where is this documented?
<--- Score
27. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
28. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
29. What was the context?
<--- Score
30. Is scope creep really all bad news?
<--- Score
31. Is there a completed SIPOC representation, describing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, and Customers?
<--- Score
32. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Health action process approach leverage and how?
<--- Score
33. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
34. How and when will the baselines be defined?
<--- Score
35. Has a team charter been developed and communicated?
<--- Score
36. What happens if Health action process approach’s scope changes?
<--- Score
37. What are the record-keeping requirements of Health action process approach activities?
<--- Score
38. What is the context?
<--- Score
39. What baselines are required to be defined and managed?
<--- Score
40. What is the definition of success?
<--- Score
41. What is in scope?
<--- Score
42. Is the scope of Health action process approach defined?
<--- Score
43. What is the scope of Health action process approach?
<--- Score
44. Has a Health action process approach requirement not been met?
<--- Score
45. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
46. What is the scope?
<--- Score
47. Do the problem and goal statements meet the SMART criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound)?
<--- Score
48. Scope of sensitive information?
<--- Score
49. Is the Health action process approach scope manageable?
<--- Score
50. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
51. СКАЧАТЬ