Название: Functional Data Analysis A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867459897
isbn:
98. Who is gathering Functional data analysis information?
<--- Score
99. Are different versions of process maps needed to account for the different types of inputs?
<--- Score
100. How would you define Functional data analysis leadership?
<--- Score
101. Have all of the relationships been defined properly?
<--- Score
102. What constraints exist that might impact the team?
<--- Score
103. How did the Functional data analysis manager receive input to the development of a Functional data analysis improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
104. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Functional data analysis goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
105. Is Functional data analysis required?
<--- Score
106. Has the Functional data analysis work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
107. What are the Functional data analysis use cases?
<--- Score
108. What is out of scope?
<--- Score
109. Has a Functional data analysis requirement not been met?
<--- Score
110. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
111. What would be the goal or target for a Functional data analysis’s improvement team?
<--- Score
112. What key stakeholder process output measure(s) does Functional data analysis leverage and how?
<--- Score
113. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
114. How do you manage changes in Functional data analysis requirements?
<--- Score
115. Will team members regularly document their Functional data analysis work?
<--- Score
116. Why are you doing Functional data analysis and what is the scope?
<--- Score
117. How do you gather requirements?
<--- Score
118. How do you catch Functional data analysis definition inconsistencies?
<--- Score
119. Are roles and responsibilities formally defined?
<--- Score
120. Is Functional data analysis linked to key stakeholder goals and objectives?
<--- Score
121. Are the Functional data analysis requirements testable?
<--- Score
122. What knowledge or experience is required?
<--- Score
123. Are there any constraints known that bear on the ability to perform Functional data analysis work? How is the team addressing them?
<--- Score
124. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
125. When is/was the Functional data analysis start date?
<--- Score
126. How do you manage unclear Functional data analysis requirements?
<--- Score
127. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
128. Are customer(s) identified and segmented according to their different needs and requirements?
<--- Score
129. What is in the scope and what is not in scope?
<--- Score
130. What is the scope of the Functional data analysis work?
<--- Score
131. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
132. What is a worst-case scenario for losses?
<--- Score
133. Do you have a Functional data analysis success story or case study ready to tell and share?
<--- Score
134. What customer feedback methods were used to solicit their input?
<--- Score
135. Who defines (or who defined) the rules and roles?
<--- Score
136. How do you hand over Functional data analysis context?
<--- Score
Add up total points for this section: _____ = Total points for this section
Divided by: ______ (number of statements answered) = ______ Average score for this section
Transfer your score to the Functional data analysis Index at the beginning of the Self-Assessment.
CRITERION #3: MEASURE:
INTENT: Gather the correct data. Measure the current performance and evolution of the situation.
In my belief, the answer to this question is clearly defined:
5 СКАЧАТЬ