Название: Green Infrastructure For Water Management A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition
Автор: Gerardus Blokdyk
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Зарубежная деловая литература
isbn: 9781867459347
isbn:
45. What intelligence can you gather?
<--- Score
46. Are accountability and ownership for Green Infrastructure for Water Management clearly defined?
<--- Score
47. Is the team adequately staffed with the desired cross-functionality? If not, what additional resources are available to the team?
<--- Score
48. What Green Infrastructure for Water Management services do you require?
<--- Score
49. The political context: who holds power?
<--- Score
50. Is the Green Infrastructure for Water Management scope manageable?
<--- Score
51. Is Green Infrastructure for Water Management currently on schedule according to the plan?
<--- Score
52. Is data collected and displayed to better understand customer(s) critical needs and requirements.
<--- Score
53. What are the requirements for audit information?
<--- Score
54. How does the Green Infrastructure for Water Management manager ensure against scope creep?
<--- Score
55. Do you all define Green Infrastructure for Water Management in the same way?
<--- Score
56. What is out-of-scope initially?
<--- Score
57. Has anyone else (internal or external to the group) attempted to solve this problem or a similar one before? If so, what knowledge can be leveraged from these previous efforts?
<--- Score
58. If substitutes have been appointed, have they been briefed on the Green Infrastructure for Water Management goals and received regular communications as to the progress to date?
<--- Score
59. What information should you gather?
<--- Score
60. How do you think the partners involved in Green Infrastructure for Water Management would have defined success?
<--- Score
61. What sources do you use to gather information for a Green Infrastructure for Water Management study?
<--- Score
62. Are required metrics defined, what are they?
<--- Score
63. Is the scope of Green Infrastructure for Water Management defined?
<--- Score
64. What are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management tasks and definitions?
<--- Score
65. Are there different segments of customers?
<--- Score
66. What Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirements should be gathered?
<--- Score
67. Is there regularly 100% attendance at the team meetings? If not, have appointed substitutes attended to preserve cross-functionality and full representation?
<--- Score
68. How do you hand over Green Infrastructure for Water Management context?
<--- Score
69. Has a Green Infrastructure for Water Management requirement not been met?
<--- Score
70. Is the work to date meeting requirements?
<--- Score
71. How was the ‘as is’ process map developed, reviewed, verified and validated?
<--- Score
72. Where can you gather more information?
<--- Score
73. What are the core elements of the Green Infrastructure for Water Management business case?
<--- Score
74. Are approval levels defined for contracts and supplements to contracts?
<--- Score
75. What scope to assess?
<--- Score
76. Are task requirements clearly defined?
<--- Score
77. Is the team equipped with available and reliable resources?
<--- Score
78. Has the Green Infrastructure for Water Management work been fairly and/or equitably divided and delegated among team members who are qualified and capable to perform the work? Has everyone contributed?
<--- Score
79. Who are the Green Infrastructure for Water Management improvement team members, including Management Leads and Coaches?
<--- Score
80. How can the value of Green Infrastructure for Water Management be defined?
<--- Score
81. How do you manage scope?
<--- Score
82. How did the Green Infrastructure for Water Management manager receive input to the development of a Green Infrastructure for Water Management improvement plan and the estimated completion dates/times of each activity?
<--- Score
83. What scope do you want your strategy to cover?
<--- Score
84. What is in scope?
<--- Score
85. Is the improvement team aware of the different versions of a process: what they think it is vs. what it actually is vs. what it should be vs. what it could be?
<--- СКАЧАТЬ