Название: Conscientious Objectors in Israel
Автор: Erica Weiss
Издательство: Ingram
Жанр: Биология
Серия: The Ethnography of Political Violence
isbn: 9780812209426
isbn:
Conscientious Objectors in Israel
THE ETHNOGRAPHY OF POLITICAL VIOLENCE
Tobias Kelly, Series Editor
A complete list of books in the series is available from the publisher.
Conscientious Objectors in Israel
CITIZENSHIP, SACRIFICE, TRIALS OF FEALTY
Erica Weiss
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS
PHILADELPHIA
Copyright © 2014 University of Pennsylvania Press
All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher.
Published by
University of Pennsylvania Press
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112
Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Weiss, Erica, 1981–
Conscientious objectors in Israel : citizenship, sacrifice, trials of fealty / Erica Weiss. — 1st ed.
p. cm. — (Ethnography of political violence)
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-8122-4592-9 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Conscientious objectors—Israel. 2. Conscientious objection—Israel. 3. Arab-Israeli conflict—1993—Conscientious objectors. 4. Arab-Israeli conflict—1993—Moral and ethical aspects. 5. Soldiers—Political activity—Israel. 6. Conscientious objectors—Legal status, laws, etc.—Israel. I. Title. II. Series: Ethnography of political violence.
UB342.I75W45 2014
355.2'24095694—dc23
2013038753
For Micky
CONTENTS
2. Every Tongue’s Got to Confess
4. Pacifist? Prove It! The Adjudication of Conscience
5. The Yoke of Conscience and the Binds of Community
Introduction
Conscience twinges. It pinches, tugs, stabs and pricks. It must be wrestled with, when one is not plagued by it. It calls and dictates. It is a worm, and a court. Conscience is articulated in these ways as the most solitary, individual, and idiosyncratic of faculties. Yet, as both a personal ethical experience and a potent public discourse, conscience also dramatically reshapes the social terrain. Conscience can make the illegal legal and the offensive admirable, or have the opposite effect. Beliefs regarding the inviolability of conscience in Western ethical traditions persist in close relation to idea that religious beliefs need to be protected and privileged above other social obligations. Despite these claims to precedence, conscience does not displace other social obligations, loyalties, responsibilities, and sacrifices that refuse to be slighted without consequence. The following ethnography of the social life of conscientious objection from military service in Israel exposes the tension between the liberal protections of individual rights the state provides and an idea of citizenship that requires great and specific sacrifices. The links between citizenship and sacrifice shape the politics of both consent and dissent. Although conscience is a strong cultural claim, carrying the weight of its long and exalted philosophical genealogy through Socrates, John Locke, and Immanuel Kant, military refusal challenges Israeli state sovereignty in a fundamental way. It questions the state’s moral authority and challenges the state’s coercive capabilities. Yet conscience sits precariously and partially outside the jurisdictional bounds of state power. The war of position described in what follows, over the ideal relationship between the ethics of the individual, the community, and the state,1 has many guises, sometimes strategic, sometimes visceral, and often agonizingly played out in the most intimate of spaces.
Conscientious objection forces a number of difficult questions to the fore. What do religious and ethnic belonging entail? Why is it legitimate for the state to require you to risk your life in war, but illegitimate to ask you to risk your conscience? Refusal of military service in Israel reflects more than ethical qualms over violence: it also reflects the central ontology of the Israeli state and its notions of community, loyalty, obligation, and betrayal always tied to the question of Palestine. The social negotiation of conscientious objection takes place with a constant eye to the Palestinian other, who is the ethical object of refusal. This dissent is with regard not only to the occupation, but also to broader beliefs on ethical responsibility to others and the limits of such responsibility. Many who have investigated zones of conflict are familiar with the ideological and discursive processes that can lead an individual to take part in violence, such as dehumanization and the cultivation of fear. On the contrary, conscientious objection investigates whether an individual is allowed—ethically, socially, legally, or politically—to refuse participation in sanctioned violence.
Conscientious objection in Israel unearths fundamental tensions regarding social relationships and obligations in modern rights-oriented democracies. Claims of conscience expose a different side of the individual’s СКАЧАТЬ