Animal Characters. Bruce Thomas Boehrer

Чтение книги онлайн.

СКАЧАТЬ

      

      A volume in the Haney Foundation Series,

      established in 1961 with the generous support

      of Dr. John Louis Haney

      Animal Characters

      Nonhuman Beings in Early Modern Literature

      Bruce Thomas Boehrer

      UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PRESS

      PHILADELPHIA • OXFORD

      Copyright © 2010 University of Pennsylvania Press

      All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations used for purposes of review or scholarly citation, none of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher.

      Published by

      University of Pennsylvania Press

      Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4112

      Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper

      10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

      Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

      Boehrer, Bruce Thomas.

      Animal characters : nonhuman beings in early modern literature / Bruce Thomas Boehrer.

      p. cm. — (Haney Foundation series)

      Includes bibliographical references and index.

      ISBN 978-0-8122-4249-2 (acid-free paper)

      1. Animals in literature. 2. Characters and characteristics in literature. 3. English literature—Early modern, 1500-1700—History and criticism. 4. European literature—Renaissance, 1450-1600—History and criticism. 5. Symbolism in literature. 6. Animals, Mythical, in literature. 7. Animals in art. I. Title.

      PR149.A7B64 2010

      820.9’374—dc22

      2010004557

       Contents

Introduction: Animal Studies and the Problem of Character

Chapter 1. Baiardo's Legacy

       Chapter 2. The Cardinal's Parrot

       Chapter 3. Ecce Feles

       Chapter 4. The People's Peacock

       Chapter 5. “Vulgar Sheepe”

       Conclusion: O Blazing World

       Notes

       Works Cited

       Index

       Acknowledgments

Introduction

       Animal Studies and the Problem of Character

      In February 1944, having just completed the manuscript of Animal Farm, George Orwell submitted to one of the most melancholy rituals to darken any professional writer's life: finding a publisher for his newly finished book. While making the usual rounds, he had the misfortune to send his novel to the American offices of Dial, whose response he recalled two years later in a letter to his agent, Leonard Moore: “I am not sure whether one can count on the American public grasping what [Animal Farm] is about. You may remember that the Dial Press had been asking me for some years for a manuscript, but when I sent the MS of AF in 1944 they returned it, saying shortly that ‘it was impossible to sell animal stories in the USA.’ Just recently they wrote saying that ‘there had been some mistake’ and that they would like to make another offer for the book. I rather gather they had at first taken it for a bona fide animal story” (Orwell 4:110). For Orwell (who never had much use for the United States), this incident reflects on the obtuseness of the American reading public; for me, it says more about the failures of the literary profession. In addition, it says something about the uncomfortable relationship between nonhuman animals and modern notions of literary character.

      This book deals with a period of literary history—the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries—that substantially predates Animal Farm. Still, one way to understand Orwell's novel is to place it within the European tradition of beast fable, poetry, and prose narrative that stretches back to Aesop and encompasses works directly germane to the present study: for example, the Roman de Renart (twelfth and thirteenth centuries), Chaucer's Nun's Priest's Tale (1396-1400), Skelton's “Speke, Parrot” (c. 1525), and the fables of La Fontaine (1668). However, this tradition has largely gone fallow over the past two centuries, with the result that modern literary works foregrounding animal subjectivity usually tend to be marginalized as genre fiction: for instance, children's literature (The Wind in the Willows, Winnie the Pooh) or fantasy (His Dark Materials, The Chronicles of Narnia).¹ It is in this general spirit that Dial's reader understood and dismissed Orwell's novel as an animal story. Granted, one may also make sense of modern works dealing with animal characters by classifying them as exercises in allegory or surrealism or experimental fiction (Kafka's “Report to an Academy” and “Investigations of a Dog” come to mind). Indeed, the real failure of the reader for Dial Press is that she misidentified a work we tend to locate in the latter of these categories (allegorical and experimental) as belonging to the former (naive genre fiction). However, even literary works in the second category end up outside the literary mainstream, defined either as retrograde (for example, allegory) or idiosyncratic (for example, experimental fiction). In any case, what Dial Press called “animal stories” seem to require a special dispensation for their continued existence in the modern literary world. They stand as deviations from the norm, to be tolerated rather than encouraged.

      John Ruskin offers us a way of understanding this development when he introduces his notion of the pathetic fallacy in Modern Painters (1843). For Ruskin, the pathetic fallacy is “always the sign of a morbid state of mind” (368) while also managing to be “eminently characteristic of the modern mind” (369)—observations that, taken together, lead inevitably to a debased and pathological view of modernity. Indeed, the pathetic fallacy's fallaciousness and its morbidity consist in the very same thing: “a falseness in…our impressions of external things,” which results from “a mind and body…too weak to deal fully with what is before them” (364, 365) and which invests the natural world with the observer's own passions. Weakness of temperament (we might say weakness of character) generates the error, which leads the afflicted individual to invest brute nature with emotions she experiences but which, by virtue of its very brutishness, nature cannot share. The self is so overwhelmed with itself that it imprints itself on the rest of the world.

      Ruskin's examples of this phenomenon are all drawn carefully from non-sentient nature: shivering crocuses, dancing leaves, “raging waves,” “remorseless foods,” “ravenous СКАЧАТЬ