Modern Hand to Hand Combat. Hakim Isler

Чтение книги онлайн.

      I believe that there is no need to completely reinvent the wheel. There once existed a warrior and fighting force that had many similarities to the modern American fighting force: samurai warriors. In many ways, today’s military service member can be perceived as a modern samurai. Similarities range from the advanced capabilities of service members to a similarity in values/virtues:

      The virtues expected of the U.S. soldier bears a remarkable resemblance to those of a samurai warrior. The modern soldier can adapt more than these martial virtues, it’s from the samurai that an effective, efficient, and simple means of armored hand-to-hand combat can be adapted for today’s battlefield.

      Misconceiving the Battle

      There is a thriving misconception in America’s martial arts community that many of the older martial arts systems (which are still studied today) were created as a response to battlefield conditions and, thus, have been battlefield tested. Therefore, to those who teach these systems to the military, it makes perfect sense that these arts are appropriate for fighting in a modern battlefield environment. The truth is that many of these martial arts systems came from a time and place where people were not encumbered by the modern American warfighter’s weaknesses, nor endowed with their strengths in battle.

      In regards to most of the systems that originated in Japan, which are either taught in America or are the foundation of American systems, their origins probably reach back to the start of the peaceful era of Japan’s history: the Edo Era, which began around 1603. This eventually transitioned into the peaceful era known as the Meiji restoration, which started in 1868. Most martial art systems studied today originated during the Meiji restoration. Martial arts born during this period were called budo (“martial way/path”), but are now called gendai budo (“modern martial way/path”). Because they were spawned during peace, these martial arts focused more on the inner aspects of the practitioner than they did on battlefield preparedness and application. Thus, these arts— though tested in competitions and in other fashions—were not necessarily tested on the battlefield. Some of the martial arts born during the Meiji Era include judo, kendo, iaido, aikido, and kempo.

      Before this peaceful era, there was a definitive militaristic interest placed on martial systems. Because the periods before the Edo Era and Meiji Era were riddled with war, the emphasis on battlefield combat was of utmost importance. The period that spawned the creation of many of these battlefield systems was called the Sengoku Jidai (Period of the Warring States), which lasted approximately from the mid-1400s to 1573. These systems are known today as koryu bujutsu (old tradition martial techniques). However, during the Warring State Period they were simply called bujutsu (martial techniques).

      For the samurai, fighting in close-quarters hand-to-hand combat was viewed as honorable, and sometimes even preferred, therefore, close-combat methods for the battlefield were given great emphasis. Understanding that close quarter fighting would occur while wearing armor, these systems would extensively cover fighting with weapons and grappling while wearing heavy body armor. These armed and unarmed combat methods of fighting while armored had many names, such as: Koshi no Mawari, Katchu Bujutsu, Yoroi Kumiuchi, Yotsugumi, and Kogusoku.

      Protecting the Body

      The samurai wore many different types of armor, depending on the time period and construction. However, two main styles primarily stood apart from the rest: the O-yoroi and the Domaru. The O-yoroi (“great/big armor”) was used primarily for mounted cavalry due to its weight. This armor was worn only by the upper class and higher-ranking samurai.

      The Domaru (“around the body”) was lighter and, therefore, worn primarily by the infantry. When reading about these two styles of armor, one who has stepped foot on the modern day battlefield will be reminded of the difference between armor worn while mounted in the turret gunner’s seat and the armor worn by the dismounted service member. In Iraq, generally, the turret gunner had to wear more armor because of his greater risk of exposure. Snipers and improvised explosive devices (I.E.D.s) caused many casualties, due to the exposure of this position. The answer was to provide more personal armor for the turret gunner. Dismounted individuals, although more exposed, have to move on foot while carrying heavy equipment. Thus, they sometimes wore less armor to reduce or balance out the weight on their bodies and maintain some level of agility while conducting urban operations.

      Armor Comparison

      For its time, samurai armor was very advanced in its protective nature and design. As stated earlier, improvements were constantly being made as samurai returning from the battlefield provided information on changes that could enhance their armor’s effectiveness, as well as information gained from other cultures. Through similar trial and error, we are learning and improving our armor in the same way the samurai did so long ago. The armor worn by today’s U.S. military not only bears great resemblance in design and function to the samurai’s, but the weight of the armor is also similar. Samurai armor could weigh 60 pounds and up; the modern U.S. service member’s СКАЧАТЬ